Investment Protection in the Americas: The Legal, Economic and Policy Implications of the Investment Chapter in the Ftaa

Laura Páez
{"title":"Investment Protection in the Americas: The Legal, Economic and Policy Implications of the Investment Chapter in the Ftaa","authors":"Laura Páez","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.877067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following paper analyses possible legal and economic arguments supporting the inclusion of an investment chapter in the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), which is currently on the negotiating agenda. In particular, by looking at some of the former integration efforts and their contribution to investment protection, it draw lessons from these previous experiences, in an attempt to determine what could realistically be expected from the FTAA. Further, provisions in existing FTAs are compared with the FTAA proposal on investment, in order to determine if the latter will either congest or genuinely enhance investment protection. From a legal perspective, the cross-comparison of existing agreements reveals that the FTAA investment chapter could have the positive effect of raising protection and harmonizing treatment in the region. However, the economic rationale for the FTAA fostering investments is not so strong. Existing FTAs with investment provisions have promoted trade rather than investments, as the empirical analysis reveals. In the particular case of Andean countries, evidence on substitution is found, where sourcing countries prefer to trade rather than invest. This means that the FTAA is likely to promote trade rather than investments in that region, as the previous experiences with the Andean Community of Nations (CAN), NAFTA and the Group of 3 suggests. Therefore, despite the inclusion of an investment chapter in the FTAA and its positive effect of raising legal certainty, FDI is not expected to increase as a result of higher protection. Therefore, if countries are to benefit from the spillovers of greater capital flows they must focus on economic policy design in the FTAA context. In the light of the unsatisfactory reforms in South America, the negotiation outcome of the investment chapter will greatly determine the extent to which members may define their policy and development strategies.","PeriodicalId":365224,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Investment (Topic)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Investment (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.877067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The following paper analyses possible legal and economic arguments supporting the inclusion of an investment chapter in the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), which is currently on the negotiating agenda. In particular, by looking at some of the former integration efforts and their contribution to investment protection, it draw lessons from these previous experiences, in an attempt to determine what could realistically be expected from the FTAA. Further, provisions in existing FTAs are compared with the FTAA proposal on investment, in order to determine if the latter will either congest or genuinely enhance investment protection. From a legal perspective, the cross-comparison of existing agreements reveals that the FTAA investment chapter could have the positive effect of raising protection and harmonizing treatment in the region. However, the economic rationale for the FTAA fostering investments is not so strong. Existing FTAs with investment provisions have promoted trade rather than investments, as the empirical analysis reveals. In the particular case of Andean countries, evidence on substitution is found, where sourcing countries prefer to trade rather than invest. This means that the FTAA is likely to promote trade rather than investments in that region, as the previous experiences with the Andean Community of Nations (CAN), NAFTA and the Group of 3 suggests. Therefore, despite the inclusion of an investment chapter in the FTAA and its positive effect of raising legal certainty, FDI is not expected to increase as a result of higher protection. Therefore, if countries are to benefit from the spillovers of greater capital flows they must focus on economic policy design in the FTAA context. In the light of the unsatisfactory reforms in South America, the negotiation outcome of the investment chapter will greatly determine the extent to which members may define their policy and development strategies.
《美洲投资保护:自由贸易区投资章节的法律、经济和政策影响》
下面的论文分析了支持在美洲自由贸易区(FTAA)中纳入投资章节的可能的法律和经济论据,该章节目前正在谈判议程上。特别是,通过研究以前的一些一体化努力及其对投资保护的贡献,它从这些以前的经验中吸取教训,试图确定可以从自由贸易区实际期望得到什么。此外,将现有自由贸易协定的规定与自由贸易协定关于投资的建议进行比较,以确定后者是否会增加或真正加强投资保护。从法律的角度来看,对现有协定的交叉比较表明,自由贸易区投资章节可以在该地区提高保护和协调待遇方面发挥积极作用。然而,自由贸易区促进投资的经济理由并不那么充分。实证分析表明,现有的带有投资条款的自由贸易协定促进了贸易,而不是投资。在安第斯国家的特殊情况下,发现了替代的证据,采购国更愿意进行贸易而不是投资。这意味着自由贸易区很可能促进该地区的贸易,而不是投资,正如以前在安第斯国家共同体、北美自由贸易区和三国集团的经验所表明的那样。因此,尽管在自由贸易区中纳入了投资章节,并对提高法律确定性产生了积极影响,但预计外国直接投资不会因为更高的保护而增加。因此,如果各国要从更大资本流动的溢出效应中受益,它们必须把重点放在自由贸易区背景下的经济政策设计上。鉴于南美洲的改革不令人满意,投资章节的谈判结果将在很大程度上决定各成员确定其政策和发展战略的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信