An Experimental Comparison of Three Optical Trackers for Model Based Pose Determination in Virtual Reality

R. V. Liere, A. V. Rhijn
{"title":"An Experimental Comparison of Three Optical Trackers for Model Based Pose Determination in Virtual Reality","authors":"R. V. Liere, A. V. Rhijn","doi":"10.2312/EGVE/EGVE04/025-034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years many optical trackers have been proposed for usage in Virtual Environments. In this paper, we compare three model based optical tracking algorithms for pose determination of input devices. In particular, we study the behavior of these algorithms when applied to two-handed manipulation tasks. We experimentally show how critical parameters influence the relative accuracy, latency and robustness of each algorithm. Although the study has been performed in a specific near-field virtual environment, the results can be applied to other virtual environments such as workbenches and CAVEs.","PeriodicalId":210571,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence and Eurographics Symposium on Virtual Environments","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence and Eurographics Symposium on Virtual Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2312/EGVE/EGVE04/025-034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In recent years many optical trackers have been proposed for usage in Virtual Environments. In this paper, we compare three model based optical tracking algorithms for pose determination of input devices. In particular, we study the behavior of these algorithms when applied to two-handed manipulation tasks. We experimentally show how critical parameters influence the relative accuracy, latency and robustness of each algorithm. Although the study has been performed in a specific near-field virtual environment, the results can be applied to other virtual environments such as workbenches and CAVEs.
三种光学跟踪器在虚拟现实中基于模型姿态确定的实验比较
近年来,人们提出了许多用于虚拟环境的光学跟踪器。在本文中,我们比较了三种基于模型的光学跟踪算法用于输入设备的姿态确定。特别地,我们研究了这些算法在应用于双手操作任务时的行为。我们通过实验证明了关键参数如何影响每个算法的相对精度、延迟和鲁棒性。虽然该研究是在特定的近场虚拟环境中进行的,但其结果可以应用于其他虚拟环境,如工作台和洞穴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信