Willingness to pay for antipsychotic medications in two tertiary health institutions in Nigeria

Wednesday J Edefo, S. Usifoh, W. Udezi
{"title":"Willingness to pay for antipsychotic medications in two tertiary health institutions in Nigeria","authors":"Wednesday J Edefo, S. Usifoh, W. Udezi","doi":"10.4103/nnjcr.nnjcr_23_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Antipsychotic medications availability and affordability enhance patients' compliance and consequently improving their productivity. In Nigeria, where about half the number of her population is impoverished, and health-care cost burden is mostly out of pocket of patients. The study objectives are to determine patients' preference in three antipsychotic medications with different attributes and side/adverse effects and a hypothetical antipsychotics medication with highest efficacy and highest risk, which of the drug's willingness to pay (WTP) price is closer to the actual amount of the medication, as well as the demographic factors that influence WTP of antipsychotic medications. Methods: WTP instrument was administered to 706 consenting patients. The characteristics ranging from efficacy, duration of administration, and possibility of eliciting side/adverse effects of the drugs was provided. A contingent valuation method was used where a virtual market scenario of 20 payment options was presented to the patients with different prices ranging from N 100 ($ 0.33) to NGN5000 (USD16.67). As at the time of this study, $1 (USD) was equivalent to N300.00 (NGN). A linear multivariate analysis was employed to determine the influence of sociodemographic factors on WTP. Results: At most of the given prices, more patients were willing to pay for the hypothetical antipsychotic D. The WTP for all the medications except haloperidol indicated by most of the respondents were above their reference prices. Longer duration of previous treatment, higher educational status, higher income, and stable marital status gave P = 0.001, P = 0.015, P < 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively. Conclusion: Patients preferred the medication that has the highest efficacy and attendant risk; majority of the patients are willing to pay at a lower price than the prevailing price for all medications used except haloperidol. The duration of previous drug treatment, income, age, education, and marital status significantly affected the WTP of drugs.","PeriodicalId":261902,"journal":{"name":"New Nigerian Journal of Clinical Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Nigerian Journal of Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/nnjcr.nnjcr_23_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Antipsychotic medications availability and affordability enhance patients' compliance and consequently improving their productivity. In Nigeria, where about half the number of her population is impoverished, and health-care cost burden is mostly out of pocket of patients. The study objectives are to determine patients' preference in three antipsychotic medications with different attributes and side/adverse effects and a hypothetical antipsychotics medication with highest efficacy and highest risk, which of the drug's willingness to pay (WTP) price is closer to the actual amount of the medication, as well as the demographic factors that influence WTP of antipsychotic medications. Methods: WTP instrument was administered to 706 consenting patients. The characteristics ranging from efficacy, duration of administration, and possibility of eliciting side/adverse effects of the drugs was provided. A contingent valuation method was used where a virtual market scenario of 20 payment options was presented to the patients with different prices ranging from N 100 ($ 0.33) to NGN5000 (USD16.67). As at the time of this study, $1 (USD) was equivalent to N300.00 (NGN). A linear multivariate analysis was employed to determine the influence of sociodemographic factors on WTP. Results: At most of the given prices, more patients were willing to pay for the hypothetical antipsychotic D. The WTP for all the medications except haloperidol indicated by most of the respondents were above their reference prices. Longer duration of previous treatment, higher educational status, higher income, and stable marital status gave P = 0.001, P = 0.015, P < 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively. Conclusion: Patients preferred the medication that has the highest efficacy and attendant risk; majority of the patients are willing to pay at a lower price than the prevailing price for all medications used except haloperidol. The duration of previous drug treatment, income, age, education, and marital status significantly affected the WTP of drugs.
愿意在尼日利亚的两个三级保健机构支付抗精神病药物
目的:抗精神病药物的可获得性和可负担性提高了患者的依从性,从而提高了他们的工作效率。在尼日利亚,大约有一半的人口处于贫困状态,医疗费用负担大多由病人自己掏腰包。研究的目的是确定患者对三种不同属性和副作用的抗精神病药物和一种疗效最高、风险最高的假设抗精神病药物的偏好,哪种药物的支付意愿(WTP)价格更接近实际用药量,以及影响抗精神病药物WTP的人口统计学因素。方法:采用WTP仪对706例患者进行治疗。提供了药物的疗效、给药时间和引起副作用的可能性等特征。采用条件估值法,向患者提供20种支付方案的虚拟市场场景,价格从100挪威克朗(0.33美元)到5000挪威克朗(16.67美元)不等。在本研究中,1美元相当于N300.00 (NGN)。采用线性多变量分析确定社会人口因素对WTP的影响。结果:在大多数给定的价格下,更多的患者愿意支付假设的抗精神病药d。除氟哌啶醇外,大多数受访者指出的所有药物的WTP均高于其参考价格。既往治疗时间较长、学历较高、收入较高、婚姻状况稳定分别给予P = 0.001、P = 0.015、P < 0.001、P = 0.002。结论:患者倾向于选择疗效最高、风险最大的药物;除氟哌啶醇外,大多数患者愿意以低于现行价格购买所有使用的药物。既往药物治疗时间、收入、年龄、文化程度、婚姻状况对药物WTP有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信