Reassessing private practice in public hospitals in Ireland

M. Mueller, Karolina Socha-Dietrich
{"title":"Reassessing private practice in public hospitals in Ireland","authors":"M. Mueller, Karolina Socha-Dietrich","doi":"10.1787/111171d3-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2017, the “Slaintecare Report” proposed a comprehensive overhaul of the Irish health system including a reform proposal to phase out private practice in public hospitals to end the unequal treatment of public and private patients – private patients typically have quicker access to care – and reduce waiting times for public patients. This paper summarises the arguments for and against this practice that were put forward to help inform the subsequent policy debate. The paper compares how private practice is regulated and organised in Ireland with the situation in four other OECD countries – Australia, France, Israel and the United Kingdom - and discusses the costs and benefits of private practice in public hospitals, and highlights potential consequences of a ban on this practice. It also describes the information required when making a decision whether to ban this practice or not. Finally, the paper discusses some alternative policy approaches that could replace or complement a ban of private practice to discontinue the unequal treatment of public and private patients.","PeriodicalId":302579,"journal":{"name":"OECD Health Working Papers","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OECD Health Working Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/111171d3-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In 2017, the “Slaintecare Report” proposed a comprehensive overhaul of the Irish health system including a reform proposal to phase out private practice in public hospitals to end the unequal treatment of public and private patients – private patients typically have quicker access to care – and reduce waiting times for public patients. This paper summarises the arguments for and against this practice that were put forward to help inform the subsequent policy debate. The paper compares how private practice is regulated and organised in Ireland with the situation in four other OECD countries – Australia, France, Israel and the United Kingdom - and discusses the costs and benefits of private practice in public hospitals, and highlights potential consequences of a ban on this practice. It also describes the information required when making a decision whether to ban this practice or not. Finally, the paper discusses some alternative policy approaches that could replace or complement a ban of private practice to discontinue the unequal treatment of public and private patients.
重新评估爱尔兰公立医院的私人执业
2017年,《Slaintecare报告》提出对爱尔兰卫生系统进行全面改革,其中包括一项改革建议,逐步淘汰公立医院的私人诊所,以结束公立医院和私立医院患者的不平等待遇——私立医院患者通常能更快获得护理——并减少公立医院患者的等待时间。本文总结了支持和反对这种做法的论点,这些论点被提出,以帮助为随后的政策辩论提供信息。这篇论文比较了爱尔兰与其他四个经合组织国家——澳大利亚、法国、以色列和英国——对私人诊所的监管和组织方式,讨论了公立医院私人诊所的成本和收益,并强调了禁止这种做法的潜在后果。它还描述了在决定是否禁止这种做法时所需的信息。最后,本文讨论了一些替代政策方法,可以取代或补充禁止私人执业,以停止对公立和私立患者的不平等待遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信