Peer Review of the Plausible Profiles Corrosion Assessment Model

J. Kiefner
{"title":"Peer Review of the Plausible Profiles Corrosion Assessment Model","authors":"J. Kiefner","doi":"10.1115/IPC2020-9254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n An enhanced corrosion assessment model has been developed by TC Energy. The new model is called the “Plausible Profiles Model for Corrosion Assessment” or “Psqr” for short and is described in three IPC 2020 papers1,2,3. The Psqr model uses a probabilistic approach for creating a number of plausible profiles along a corroded area. The predicted failure pressure for each plausible profile is calculated using RSTRENG, resulting in a probabilistic distribution of predicted failure pressures. The predicted failure pressure for the corroded area is taken to be the lower 5th percentile value of the distribution.\n TC Energy requested that PRCI sponsor an independent review of the Psqr model by subject matter experts (SMEs). The PRCI Corrosion Technical Committee and TC Energy jointly selected a team of SMEs to conduct the review. The team was comprised of the following individuals:\n • Maher Nessim — C-FER Technologies\n • Ming Gao — Blade Energy Partners\n • Ravi Krishnamurthy — Blade Energy Partners\n • Phil Hopkins — Independent Consultant\n • Andrew Cosham — Ninth Planet Engineering\n • Michael Rosenfeld — RSI Pipeline Solutions\n • Bruce Nestleroth — Kiefner and Associates, Inc.\n • John Kiefner — RSI Pipeline Solutions\n This paper describes the work carried out by the SMEs and presents their findings and conclusions. Basically, they found that the model is more accurate and exhibits less scatter than existing models such as RSTRENG, B31G, and Modified B31G4. They recommended that the Psqr Model be implemented in conjunction with a high-quality corrosion management plan such as that outlined in TC Energy’s technical report5, and they recommended specific minimum Psqr-predicted failure stress levels for use on pipelines being operated at maximum stress levels ranging from 40% of SMYS to 80% of SMYS.","PeriodicalId":273758,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","volume":"67 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2020-9254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An enhanced corrosion assessment model has been developed by TC Energy. The new model is called the “Plausible Profiles Model for Corrosion Assessment” or “Psqr” for short and is described in three IPC 2020 papers1,2,3. The Psqr model uses a probabilistic approach for creating a number of plausible profiles along a corroded area. The predicted failure pressure for each plausible profile is calculated using RSTRENG, resulting in a probabilistic distribution of predicted failure pressures. The predicted failure pressure for the corroded area is taken to be the lower 5th percentile value of the distribution. TC Energy requested that PRCI sponsor an independent review of the Psqr model by subject matter experts (SMEs). The PRCI Corrosion Technical Committee and TC Energy jointly selected a team of SMEs to conduct the review. The team was comprised of the following individuals: • Maher Nessim — C-FER Technologies • Ming Gao — Blade Energy Partners • Ravi Krishnamurthy — Blade Energy Partners • Phil Hopkins — Independent Consultant • Andrew Cosham — Ninth Planet Engineering • Michael Rosenfeld — RSI Pipeline Solutions • Bruce Nestleroth — Kiefner and Associates, Inc. • John Kiefner — RSI Pipeline Solutions This paper describes the work carried out by the SMEs and presents their findings and conclusions. Basically, they found that the model is more accurate and exhibits less scatter than existing models such as RSTRENG, B31G, and Modified B31G4. They recommended that the Psqr Model be implemented in conjunction with a high-quality corrosion management plan such as that outlined in TC Energy’s technical report5, and they recommended specific minimum Psqr-predicted failure stress levels for use on pipelines being operated at maximum stress levels ranging from 40% of SMYS to 80% of SMYS.
可信剖面腐蚀评估模型的同行评议
TC能源公司开发了一种改进的腐蚀评估模型。新模型被称为“腐蚀评估的可信剖面模型”或简称“Psqr”,并在IPC 2020的三篇论文1,2,3中进行了描述。Psqr模型使用概率方法沿腐蚀区域创建了许多似是而非的剖面。使用RSTRENG计算每个可能剖面的预测失效压力,从而得到预测失效压力的概率分布。腐蚀区域的预测破坏压力取分布中较低的第5个百分位数。TC Energy要求PRCI赞助由主题专家(sme)对Psqr模型进行独立审查。PRCI腐蚀技术委员会和TC能源联合挑选了一组中小企业进行审查。该团队由以下人员组成:•Maher Nessim - C-FER Technologies•Ming Gao - Blade Energy Partners•Ravi Krishnamurthy - Blade Energy Partners•Phil Hopkins -独立顾问•Andrew Cosham - Ninth Planet Engineering•Michael Rosenfeld - RSI Pipeline Solutions•Bruce Nestleroth - Kiefner and Associates, Inc.•John Kiefner - RSI Pipeline Solutions本文描述了中小企业开展的工作,并介绍了他们的发现和结论。基本上,他们发现该模型比现有的RSTRENG、B31G和Modified B31G4等模型更准确,分散更少。他们建议将Psqr模型与TC能源技术报告中概述的高质量腐蚀管理计划结合起来实施,并建议在最大应力水平为SMYS的40%至80%的管道上使用Psqr预测的特定最小失效应力水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信