A GA-Based Simulation System for WMNs: Performance Analysis of WMN-GA System for Different WMN Architectures Considering DCF and EDCA

Tetsuya Oda, Makoto Ikeda, L. Barolli, F. Xhafa, M. Takizawa
{"title":"A GA-Based Simulation System for WMNs: Performance Analysis of WMN-GA System for Different WMN Architectures Considering DCF and EDCA","authors":"Tetsuya Oda, Makoto Ikeda, L. Barolli, F. Xhafa, M. Takizawa","doi":"10.1109/INCoS.2015.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) are attracting a lot of attention from wireless network researchers. Node placement problems have been investigated for a long time in the optimization field due to numerous applications in location science. In our previous work, we evaluated WMN-GA system which is based on Genetic Algorithms (GAs) to find an optimal location assignment for mesh routers. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of two WMN architectures considering throughput, delay, jitter and fairness index metrics. For simulations, we used ns-3 and Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR). We compare the performance for Distributed Coordination Function (DCF) and Enhanced Distributed Channel Access (EDCA) for normal distribution of mesh clients by sending multiple Constant Bit Rate (CBR) flows in the network. The simulation results show that the throughput of I/B WMN is higher than Hybrid WMN architecture. The delay and jitter of Hybrid WMN is a lower compared with I/B WMN. The fairness index of 10 and 20 flows is higher than 30 flows for both architectures. In I/B architecture the fairness index of DCF is higher than EDCA. However, for Hybrid WMN, the fairness index of EDCA is higher than DCF.","PeriodicalId":345650,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INCoS.2015.81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) are attracting a lot of attention from wireless network researchers. Node placement problems have been investigated for a long time in the optimization field due to numerous applications in location science. In our previous work, we evaluated WMN-GA system which is based on Genetic Algorithms (GAs) to find an optimal location assignment for mesh routers. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of two WMN architectures considering throughput, delay, jitter and fairness index metrics. For simulations, we used ns-3 and Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR). We compare the performance for Distributed Coordination Function (DCF) and Enhanced Distributed Channel Access (EDCA) for normal distribution of mesh clients by sending multiple Constant Bit Rate (CBR) flows in the network. The simulation results show that the throughput of I/B WMN is higher than Hybrid WMN architecture. The delay and jitter of Hybrid WMN is a lower compared with I/B WMN. The fairness index of 10 and 20 flows is higher than 30 flows for both architectures. In I/B architecture the fairness index of DCF is higher than EDCA. However, for Hybrid WMN, the fairness index of EDCA is higher than DCF.
基于遗传算法的WMN仿真系统:考虑DCF和EDCA的不同WMN结构下WMN- ga系统性能分析
无线网状网络(Wireless Mesh Networks, WMNs)正受到无线网络研究人员的广泛关注。由于在定位科学中的大量应用,节点放置问题在优化领域已经研究了很长时间。在之前的工作中,我们评估了基于遗传算法(GAs)的WMN-GA系统来寻找网状路由器的最优位置分配。在本文中,我们考虑吞吐量、延迟、抖动和公平性指标来评估两种WMN架构的性能。为了模拟,我们使用ns-3和优化链路状态路由(OLSR)。通过在网络中发送多个恒定比特率(CBR)流,比较了分布式协调函数(DCF)和增强分布式通道访问(EDCA)在网格客户端正态分布下的性能。仿真结果表明,I/B WMN的吞吐量高于混合WMN结构。混合WMN的时延和抖动比I/B WMN低。两种架构的10流和20流的公平性指数都高于30流。在I/B架构中,DCF的公平性指数高于EDCA。而对于Hybrid WMN, EDCA的公平性指数高于DCF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信