The Rebel in the Red Jeep: Ken Hechler's Life in West Virginia Politics by Carter Taylor Seaton (review)

M. Myers
{"title":"The Rebel in the Red Jeep: Ken Hechler's Life in West Virginia Politics by Carter Taylor Seaton (review)","authors":"M. Myers","doi":"10.1353/wvh.2018.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the most integrated school in the nation. The work also situates the case study within a broader national narrative. This strength is a particular asset during the work’s final chapters which trace West Charlotte’s resegregation and institutional decline amidst the backdrop of the 1980s conservative resurgence. Unfortunately, Grundy often gets distracted in this national narrative and leaves readers grasping for a more complex understanding of West Charlotte itself. This problem is compounded by the work’s longer chronology. Grundy analyzed a period of roughly seventy-five years in less than two hundred pages. While impressive, this ultimately hindered Grundy’s ability to dig deeply enough in her analysis. As a work of scholarly inquiry seeking to contribute to the robust historiography on the Civil Rights Movement, Grundy struggled in a few critical areas. Throughout the study, Grundy overly relies on a number of oral histories she conducted. While oral histories are undeniably a rich primary source, the difficulties of oral history demand that they be studied in tandem with a plethora of other sources. Most of the individuals interviewed for the first section of the book were seventy to eighty years old and reminiscing about their elementary-school experience at West Charlotte. This is particularly a problem when she allows students to speak through rose-colored glasses about their experience in segregated schools, with little interpretation. Grundy addresses this issue in her methodology section, but this discussion should have been more overt throughout her analysis. Grundy’s work will not surprise students of the Civil Rights Movement or the history of race in the United States. Yet her analysis of the complexity of busing, the evolution of rights rhetoric surrounding whites, the downfalls of urban-renewal programs, and even the internal segregation of integrated schools does an impeccable job making these scholarly discussions approachable to a broader audience. It also interprets them within a longer institutional chronology that assists readers in grasping the ongoing impact of historical decisions. Elisabeth Moore West Virginia University","PeriodicalId":350051,"journal":{"name":"West Virginia History: A Journal of Regional Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"West Virginia History: A Journal of Regional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wvh.2018.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

the most integrated school in the nation. The work also situates the case study within a broader national narrative. This strength is a particular asset during the work’s final chapters which trace West Charlotte’s resegregation and institutional decline amidst the backdrop of the 1980s conservative resurgence. Unfortunately, Grundy often gets distracted in this national narrative and leaves readers grasping for a more complex understanding of West Charlotte itself. This problem is compounded by the work’s longer chronology. Grundy analyzed a period of roughly seventy-five years in less than two hundred pages. While impressive, this ultimately hindered Grundy’s ability to dig deeply enough in her analysis. As a work of scholarly inquiry seeking to contribute to the robust historiography on the Civil Rights Movement, Grundy struggled in a few critical areas. Throughout the study, Grundy overly relies on a number of oral histories she conducted. While oral histories are undeniably a rich primary source, the difficulties of oral history demand that they be studied in tandem with a plethora of other sources. Most of the individuals interviewed for the first section of the book were seventy to eighty years old and reminiscing about their elementary-school experience at West Charlotte. This is particularly a problem when she allows students to speak through rose-colored glasses about their experience in segregated schools, with little interpretation. Grundy addresses this issue in her methodology section, but this discussion should have been more overt throughout her analysis. Grundy’s work will not surprise students of the Civil Rights Movement or the history of race in the United States. Yet her analysis of the complexity of busing, the evolution of rights rhetoric surrounding whites, the downfalls of urban-renewal programs, and even the internal segregation of integrated schools does an impeccable job making these scholarly discussions approachable to a broader audience. It also interprets them within a longer institutional chronology that assists readers in grasping the ongoing impact of historical decisions. Elisabeth Moore West Virginia University
《红色吉普里的叛逆者:肯·赫克勒在西弗吉尼亚的政治生活》作者:卡特·泰勒·西顿(书评)
全国最融合的学校。这项工作还将案例研究置于更广泛的国家叙事中。在作品的最后几章中,这种力量是一种特别的资产,它追溯了西夏洛特在20世纪80年代保守主义复兴背景下的重新隔离和制度衰落。不幸的是,格伦迪经常在这种民族叙事中分心,让读者对西夏洛特本身有一个更复杂的理解。这个问题由于这部作品的年代较长而变得更加复杂。格朗迪在不到200页的篇幅里分析了大约75年的历史。虽然令人印象深刻,但这最终阻碍了Grundy深入分析的能力。作为一部学术研究著作,试图为民权运动的强大史学做出贡献,格朗迪在几个关键领域挣扎。在整个研究过程中,Grundy过度依赖于她所做的一些口述历史。虽然口述历史无可否认是一个丰富的第一手资料来源,但口述历史的困难要求将其与大量其他资料来源结合起来研究。在书的第一部分中,大多数接受采访的人都是七八十岁的老人,他们在回忆自己在西夏洛特的小学经历。当她允许学生带着玫瑰色的眼镜谈论他们在种族隔离学校的经历,几乎不加解释时,这尤其是个问题。Grundy在她的方法论部分提到了这个问题,但是这个讨论应该在她的分析中更加公开。研究民权运动或美国种族历史的学生不会对格朗迪的作品感到惊讶。然而,她对公共汽车的复杂性、围绕白人的权利言论的演变、城市更新计划的失败,甚至是种族隔离学校的内部隔离的分析,都做了无可挑剔的工作,使这些学术讨论能够被更广泛的受众所接受。它还在一个更长的制度年表中解释它们,帮助读者掌握历史决策的持续影响。伊丽莎白·摩尔,西弗吉尼亚大学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信