Performance Comparison and Applications of Sparsity Based Techniques for Denoising of ECG Signal

R. Devi, Hitender Kumar Tyagi, D. Kumar
{"title":"Performance Comparison and Applications of Sparsity Based Techniques for Denoising of ECG Signal","authors":"R. Devi, Hitender Kumar Tyagi, D. Kumar","doi":"10.1109/SPIN.2019.8711632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ECG denoising using different kinds of scientific techniques and methods has been an interesting research area among the signal processing research fraternity. There are various kinds of noises that interfere with ECG signal at different levels. Powerline interference, baseline wander noise and electromyography noise are at highest priority to remove from the desired signal. Several sparsity based adaptive and wavelet digital filtering techniques have been proposed in previous investigations for denoising of ECG signal. But there qualitative and quantitative performance analysis against each other is lacking in the literature. In this paper, we reviewed various sparsity based noise reduction techniques of adaptive and wavelet algorithms. Using the benchmark dataset of MIT/BIH, a detailed and fair comparison of LMS, RLS and DWT were implemented for their performance analysis. The qualitative analysis has been presented in terms of the morphology differences in the denoised signal and the quantitative analysis is presented in terms of various performance measuring parameters of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), mean square error (MSE), percentage root mean square difference (PRD) and peak-signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). The obtained results show that adaptive filtering using RLS algorithm performs better in more dense noisy conditions whereas the wavelet filtering is better to perform in less noisy conditions. Further, all three algorithms were tested on different kinds of noises like power-line interference, baseline wander and abrupt shift in the ECG data, where, DWT based filtering approach was found superior on removal of powerline and baseline wander interferences, but it fails to remove the abrupt shift kind of noise. The abrupt shift noise was best removed by both LMS and RLS adaptive algorithms but at the cost of low speed and poor quality. Thus, the presented optimized analysis of advanced three sparsity based filtering techniques would provide great potential benefits in biomedical applications of ECG signal processing, feature extraction, analysis and other related fields.","PeriodicalId":344030,"journal":{"name":"2019 6th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 6th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPIN.2019.8711632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ECG denoising using different kinds of scientific techniques and methods has been an interesting research area among the signal processing research fraternity. There are various kinds of noises that interfere with ECG signal at different levels. Powerline interference, baseline wander noise and electromyography noise are at highest priority to remove from the desired signal. Several sparsity based adaptive and wavelet digital filtering techniques have been proposed in previous investigations for denoising of ECG signal. But there qualitative and quantitative performance analysis against each other is lacking in the literature. In this paper, we reviewed various sparsity based noise reduction techniques of adaptive and wavelet algorithms. Using the benchmark dataset of MIT/BIH, a detailed and fair comparison of LMS, RLS and DWT were implemented for their performance analysis. The qualitative analysis has been presented in terms of the morphology differences in the denoised signal and the quantitative analysis is presented in terms of various performance measuring parameters of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), mean square error (MSE), percentage root mean square difference (PRD) and peak-signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). The obtained results show that adaptive filtering using RLS algorithm performs better in more dense noisy conditions whereas the wavelet filtering is better to perform in less noisy conditions. Further, all three algorithms were tested on different kinds of noises like power-line interference, baseline wander and abrupt shift in the ECG data, where, DWT based filtering approach was found superior on removal of powerline and baseline wander interferences, but it fails to remove the abrupt shift kind of noise. The abrupt shift noise was best removed by both LMS and RLS adaptive algorithms but at the cost of low speed and poor quality. Thus, the presented optimized analysis of advanced three sparsity based filtering techniques would provide great potential benefits in biomedical applications of ECG signal processing, feature extraction, analysis and other related fields.
基于稀疏度的心电信号去噪技术性能比较及应用
利用各种科学技术和方法对心电信号进行去噪一直是信号处理研究界的研究热点。有各种各样的噪声在不同程度上干扰心电信号。电力线干扰、基线漫游噪声和肌电图噪声是从期望信号中去除的最高优先级。在以往的研究中,提出了几种基于稀疏度的自适应滤波和小波数字滤波技术用于心电信号的去噪。但文献中缺乏相互对照的定性和定量绩效分析。本文综述了各种基于稀疏度的自适应和小波算法降噪技术。利用MIT/BIH的基准数据集,对LMS、RLS和DWT的性能进行了详细而公平的比较。定性分析了去噪信号的形态差异,定量分析了信噪比(SNR)、均方误差(MSE)、百分比均方根差(PRD)和峰值信噪比(PSNR)等各种性能测量参数。结果表明,采用RLS算法的自适应滤波在噪声较密集的情况下具有较好的滤波效果,而小波滤波在噪声较小的情况下具有较好的滤波效果。进一步,对这三种算法进行了心电数据中电力线干扰、基线漂移和突变等不同类型噪声的测试,发现基于小波变换的滤波方法在去除电力线和基线漂移干扰方面效果较好,但在去除突变类噪声方面效果较差。LMS和RLS自适应算法都能较好地去除突变噪声,但速度较慢,质量较差。因此,本文提出的三种基于稀疏度的先进滤波技术的优化分析,将在心电信号处理、特征提取、分析等相关领域的生物医学应用中提供巨大的潜在价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信