Şâbânî-Kuşadavî Mektuplaşma Geleneğinin Devamı: Mehmet Ali Yitik’in Nuh Naci Erdem’e Mektupları

Adalet Çakır Çağlı
{"title":"Şâbânî-Kuşadavî Mektuplaşma Geleneğinin Devamı: Mehmet Ali Yitik’in Nuh Naci Erdem’e Mektupları","authors":"Adalet Çakır Çağlı","doi":"10.26650/iuitd.2022.1053317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sufi letters have maintained their literary importance from the formation of the Sufi writing tradition to the present day. In the 10 th century, al-Sarraj drew attention to the importance of letters and recommended reading Sufis’ letters in order to become familiar with their language. Sufis were prompted to write letters for natural reason such as distance and safety. The addressees of the letters were sometimes Sufis and other times the ulama with whom they would correspond for defending or exchanging ideas, and sometimes the statements requested advice or served as a warning. The letters the murshids wrote to their followers on navigating their sülûk [spiritual path] are of great importance in terms of illuminating the history of a tariqa [Sufi school/order], such as in the formation and continuance of a tradition, as well as explaining the intricacies of the science of sülûk . Mehmed Ali Yitik ABSTRACT Sufi works started being written in the 10th century and conveyed the written and verbal knowledge of previous centuries. Sufi correspondence has an important place in written knowledge. Al-Sarraj and al-Hargushi were 10 th -century Sufi authors who have Sufi letters included among their works. Unlike al-Harguşi, however, al-Sarraj not only conveyed letters but also drew attention to their literary importance. Despite attributing special importance to the poems of his predecessors, the texts of letters have priority in analyzing and understanding the symbolic language peculiar to Sufis according to al-Sarraj. With this approach, he attributed special importance to a type of Sufi literature that has yet to be exhausted, due to the Sufi principles regarding privacy, namely protecting information from non-professionals, do not appear in the letters. Therefore, aside from their historical documental quality and literary value, the value of letters is indisputable in terms of being a source for the specific field of knowledge and unique methods of Sufism. The exact percentage of the Sufi literature that is composed of Sufi letters, which differ in terms of their content and addressees, is unknown. However, al-Sarraj talked about a numerical multiplicity enough to fill the volumes at that time.","PeriodicalId":130544,"journal":{"name":"İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi / Journal of Islamic Review","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi / Journal of Islamic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/iuitd.2022.1053317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sufi letters have maintained their literary importance from the formation of the Sufi writing tradition to the present day. In the 10 th century, al-Sarraj drew attention to the importance of letters and recommended reading Sufis’ letters in order to become familiar with their language. Sufis were prompted to write letters for natural reason such as distance and safety. The addressees of the letters were sometimes Sufis and other times the ulama with whom they would correspond for defending or exchanging ideas, and sometimes the statements requested advice or served as a warning. The letters the murshids wrote to their followers on navigating their sülûk [spiritual path] are of great importance in terms of illuminating the history of a tariqa [Sufi school/order], such as in the formation and continuance of a tradition, as well as explaining the intricacies of the science of sülûk . Mehmed Ali Yitik ABSTRACT Sufi works started being written in the 10th century and conveyed the written and verbal knowledge of previous centuries. Sufi correspondence has an important place in written knowledge. Al-Sarraj and al-Hargushi were 10 th -century Sufi authors who have Sufi letters included among their works. Unlike al-Harguşi, however, al-Sarraj not only conveyed letters but also drew attention to their literary importance. Despite attributing special importance to the poems of his predecessors, the texts of letters have priority in analyzing and understanding the symbolic language peculiar to Sufis according to al-Sarraj. With this approach, he attributed special importance to a type of Sufi literature that has yet to be exhausted, due to the Sufi principles regarding privacy, namely protecting information from non-professionals, do not appear in the letters. Therefore, aside from their historical documental quality and literary value, the value of letters is indisputable in terms of being a source for the specific field of knowledge and unique methods of Sufism. The exact percentage of the Sufi literature that is composed of Sufi letters, which differ in terms of their content and addressees, is unknown. However, al-Sarraj talked about a numerical multiplicity enough to fill the volumes at that time.
从苏非写作传统的形成到今天,苏非书信一直保持着它们的文学重要性。在10世纪,al-Sarraj注意到信件的重要性,并建议阅读苏菲派的信件,以便熟悉他们的语言。苏菲们是出于距离和安全等自然原因才写信的。这些信件的收信人有时是苏菲派,有时是乌拉玛,他们会与他们通信,为自己辩护或交换想法,有时这些声明是为了征求意见或作为警告。murshids写给他们的追随者的关于导航他们的s l k[精神道路]的信件在阐明tariqa[苏菲学派/秩序]的历史方面非常重要,例如在传统的形成和延续方面,以及解释s l k科学的复杂性。苏非著作开始于10世纪,并传达了前几个世纪的书面和口头知识。苏菲书信在书面知识中占有重要地位。Al-Sarraj和al-Hargushi是10世纪的苏菲派作家,他们的作品中有苏菲派书信。然而,与al- hargu不同的是,al-Sarraj不仅传达信件,而且使人们注意到信件在文学上的重要性。根据al-Sarraj的观点,尽管前人的诗歌具有特殊的重要性,但信件的文本在分析和理解苏菲派特有的象征语言方面具有优先地位。通过这种方法,他特别重视一种尚未穷尽的苏非文学,因为苏非关于隐私的原则,即保护非专业人士的信息,没有出现在信件中。因此,除了它们的历史文献性质和文学价值外,信件的价值在作为苏菲主义特定知识领域和独特方法的来源方面是无可争辩的。苏菲派文学中苏菲派信件的确切百分比是未知的,这些信件在内容和收信人方面有所不同。然而,al-Sarraj谈到的数字多样性足以填满当时的书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信