{"title":"Experiments with Non-Cooperative Space DTN Routing","authors":"R. Lent","doi":"10.1109/IPCCC50635.2020.9391546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, results from an experimental study of the end-to-end bundle delivery performance of two concurrent flows transmitted over a delay-tolerant network are presented. The study compares the Contact Graph Routing algorithm, which is the foundation of the CCSDS standard Schedule Aware Bundle Routing and the Cognitive Space Gateway that has been recently introduced as a cognitive networking alternative to the problem of space bundle routing. Both algorithms make non-cooperative, dynamic routing decisions for bundles at each step based on a similar utility, which is formulated as the minimum expected bundle delivery time to the destination. The study aims to find how well each algorithm plays the routing game under different conditions. The experiments were carried out on a laboratory testbed with emulated Earth-Moon communication conditions and included evaluation cases with a permanently connected substrate and a substrate that is being affected by regular link disruptions. Also, the flows were evaluated with cases where their shortest path either overlap or not. The results indicate that both routing approaches play a coherent game achieving fair performance for both flows, but with the CSG achieving better performance than the CGR approach.","PeriodicalId":226034,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 39th International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC)","volume":"74 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 39th International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCCC50635.2020.9391546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this paper, results from an experimental study of the end-to-end bundle delivery performance of two concurrent flows transmitted over a delay-tolerant network are presented. The study compares the Contact Graph Routing algorithm, which is the foundation of the CCSDS standard Schedule Aware Bundle Routing and the Cognitive Space Gateway that has been recently introduced as a cognitive networking alternative to the problem of space bundle routing. Both algorithms make non-cooperative, dynamic routing decisions for bundles at each step based on a similar utility, which is formulated as the minimum expected bundle delivery time to the destination. The study aims to find how well each algorithm plays the routing game under different conditions. The experiments were carried out on a laboratory testbed with emulated Earth-Moon communication conditions and included evaluation cases with a permanently connected substrate and a substrate that is being affected by regular link disruptions. Also, the flows were evaluated with cases where their shortest path either overlap or not. The results indicate that both routing approaches play a coherent game achieving fair performance for both flows, but with the CSG achieving better performance than the CGR approach.
本文给出了在容忍延迟网络上传输的两个并发流的端到端束传输性能的实验研究结果。该研究比较了接触图路由算法(CCSDS标准时间表感知束路由的基础)和认知空间网关(Cognitive Space Gateway),后者是最近引入的一种认知网络替代方案,用于解决空间束路由问题。这两种算法在每一步都基于类似的实用程序为包做出非合作的动态路由决策,该实用程序被表述为到目的地的最小期望包交付时间。研究的目的是找出每种算法在不同条件下的路由博弈效果。实验是在模拟地月通信条件的实验室测试台上进行的,包括永久连接基片和受定期链路中断影响的基片的评估案例。此外,流的最短路径重叠或不重叠的情况下进行评估。结果表明,两种路由方法都是一致的,对两个流都达到了公平的性能,但CSG比CGR方法获得了更好的性能。