Managing Editor’s Letter

F. Fabozzi
{"title":"Managing Editor’s Letter","authors":"F. Fabozzi","doi":"10.3905/jfds.2021.3.1.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cathy Scott General Manager and Publisher In implementing a strategic asset allocation policy, the forecasting of long-term equity market returns is critically important. Although, historically, several econometric models have been employed for forecasting, more recently machine learning methods have been used for that purpose. In “The Best of Both Worlds: Forecasting US Equity Market Returns Using a Hybrid Machine Learning–Time Series Approach,” Haifeng Wang, Harshdeep Singh Ahluwalia, Roger A. Aliaga-Díaz, and Joseph H. Davis explore machine learning methods to forecast 10-year-ahead US stock returns. To compare the relative performance of machine learning methods, the authors compare the accuracy of these methods to the forecasts of one of the most commonly used regression-based forecasting models by asset managers, the traditional Shiller cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings (CAPE) ratio model. The authors find that machine learning techniques can only modestly improve the forecast accuracy of the regression-based CAPE ratio model. Moreover, they actually result in worse performance than a vector autoregressive model (VAR)–based two-step approach introduced in 2018 by three of the authors of this article. However, when the authors implement a hybrid ML-VAR approach (i.e., VAR-based two-step approach with machine learning techniques allowing for unspecified nonlinear relationships), they find up to 56% improvement in real-time forecast accuracy for 10-year annualized US stock returns. They find the ensemble method consistently offers the best out-of-sample forecast. Machine learning applications in finance have shown benefits over traditional linear models in forecasting stock returns. Edward Leung, Harald Lohre, David Mischlich, Yifei Shea, and Maximilian Stroh quantify these benefits by comparing the forecasting performance of commonly used machine learning algorithms with that of traditional linear methods in their article “The Promises and Pitfalls of Machine Learning for Predicting Stock Returns.” Using well-known equity characteristics, the authors forecast returns for largeand mid-cap stocks from various regional indexes using a gradient boosting machine (GBM) algorithm and standard ordinary least squares (OLS) approaches. In doing so, they shed light on the mechanics and results of the GBM model in order to alleviate its black-box character. While the forecasts from GBM models outperform OLS models based on statistical tests of forecasting performance, the economic gains from such nonlinear models depend on the ability to take the appropriate risks and efficiently implement trades. Jochen Papenbrock, Peter Schwendner, Markus Jaeger, and Stephan Krügel in their article “Matrix Evolutions: Synthetic Correlations and Explainable Machine Learning for Constructing Robust Investment Portfolios” use evolutionary algorithms to simulate correlation matrixes useful for financial market applications. Referring to their novel approach to generate realistic correlation matrixes as “matrix evolutions,” they explain how it can be used for many applications in asset management, such as generating risk scenarios for portfolios, pricing of multi-asset derivatives, backtesting investment strategies, and hedging correlation-dependent investment strategies and financial products. The potential application of matrix evolutions is demonstrated by the authors in a machine learning case study for robust portfolio construction in a multi-asset universe that shows how an explainable machine learning program b y gu es t o n Ju ne 1 5, 2 02 1. C op yr ig ht 2 02 1 Pa ge an t M ed ia L td .","PeriodicalId":199045,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Financial Data Science","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Financial Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jfds.2021.3.1.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cathy Scott General Manager and Publisher In implementing a strategic asset allocation policy, the forecasting of long-term equity market returns is critically important. Although, historically, several econometric models have been employed for forecasting, more recently machine learning methods have been used for that purpose. In “The Best of Both Worlds: Forecasting US Equity Market Returns Using a Hybrid Machine Learning–Time Series Approach,” Haifeng Wang, Harshdeep Singh Ahluwalia, Roger A. Aliaga-Díaz, and Joseph H. Davis explore machine learning methods to forecast 10-year-ahead US stock returns. To compare the relative performance of machine learning methods, the authors compare the accuracy of these methods to the forecasts of one of the most commonly used regression-based forecasting models by asset managers, the traditional Shiller cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings (CAPE) ratio model. The authors find that machine learning techniques can only modestly improve the forecast accuracy of the regression-based CAPE ratio model. Moreover, they actually result in worse performance than a vector autoregressive model (VAR)–based two-step approach introduced in 2018 by three of the authors of this article. However, when the authors implement a hybrid ML-VAR approach (i.e., VAR-based two-step approach with machine learning techniques allowing for unspecified nonlinear relationships), they find up to 56% improvement in real-time forecast accuracy for 10-year annualized US stock returns. They find the ensemble method consistently offers the best out-of-sample forecast. Machine learning applications in finance have shown benefits over traditional linear models in forecasting stock returns. Edward Leung, Harald Lohre, David Mischlich, Yifei Shea, and Maximilian Stroh quantify these benefits by comparing the forecasting performance of commonly used machine learning algorithms with that of traditional linear methods in their article “The Promises and Pitfalls of Machine Learning for Predicting Stock Returns.” Using well-known equity characteristics, the authors forecast returns for largeand mid-cap stocks from various regional indexes using a gradient boosting machine (GBM) algorithm and standard ordinary least squares (OLS) approaches. In doing so, they shed light on the mechanics and results of the GBM model in order to alleviate its black-box character. While the forecasts from GBM models outperform OLS models based on statistical tests of forecasting performance, the economic gains from such nonlinear models depend on the ability to take the appropriate risks and efficiently implement trades. Jochen Papenbrock, Peter Schwendner, Markus Jaeger, and Stephan Krügel in their article “Matrix Evolutions: Synthetic Correlations and Explainable Machine Learning for Constructing Robust Investment Portfolios” use evolutionary algorithms to simulate correlation matrixes useful for financial market applications. Referring to their novel approach to generate realistic correlation matrixes as “matrix evolutions,” they explain how it can be used for many applications in asset management, such as generating risk scenarios for portfolios, pricing of multi-asset derivatives, backtesting investment strategies, and hedging correlation-dependent investment strategies and financial products. The potential application of matrix evolutions is demonstrated by the authors in a machine learning case study for robust portfolio construction in a multi-asset universe that shows how an explainable machine learning program b y gu es t o n Ju ne 1 5, 2 02 1. C op yr ig ht 2 02 1 Pa ge an t M ed ia L td .
总编辑的信
在实施战略性资产配置政策时,对股票市场长期回报的预测至关重要。虽然从历史上看,有几个计量经济学模型被用于预测,但最近机器学习方法被用于这一目的。在《两全全:使用混合机器学习-时间序列方法预测美国股市回报》中,王海峰、Harshdeep Singh Ahluwalia、Roger a . Aliaga-Díaz和Joseph H. Davis探讨了机器学习方法预测未来10年美国股市回报的方法。为了比较机器学习方法的相对性能,作者将这些方法的准确性与资产管理公司最常用的基于回归的预测模型之一——传统的Shiller周期性调整市盈率(CAPE)模型进行了比较。作者发现,机器学习技术只能适度提高基于回归的CAPE比率模型的预测精度。此外,它们实际上比本文的三位作者在2018年引入的基于向量自回归模型(VAR)的两步方法的性能更差。然而,当作者实施混合ML-VAR方法(即基于var的两步方法和允许未指定非线性关系的机器学习技术)时,他们发现10年美国股票年化回报的实时预测精度提高了56%。他们发现集合方法始终提供最好的样本外预测。在预测股票收益方面,机器学习在金融领域的应用已经显示出优于传统线性模型的优势。Edward Leung、Harald Lohre、David Mischlich、Yifei Shea和Maximilian Stroh在他们的文章《预测股票收益的机器学习的承诺和陷阱》中,通过比较常用机器学习算法与传统线性方法的预测性能,量化了这些好处。利用众所周知的股票特征,作者使用梯度增强机(GBM)算法和标准普通最小二乘(OLS)方法从各种区域指数预测大中盘股的回报。在这样做的过程中,他们阐明了GBM模型的机制和结果,以减轻其黑箱特征。虽然基于预测性能统计测试的GBM模型的预测优于OLS模型,但这种非线性模型的经济收益取决于承担适当风险和有效实施交易的能力。Jochen Papenbrock、Peter Schwendner、Markus Jaeger和Stephan kr在他们的文章“矩阵进化:构建稳健投资组合的综合相关性和可解释的机器学习”中使用进化算法来模拟对金融市场应用有用的相关矩阵。他们将生成现实关联矩阵的新方法称为“矩阵演化”,并解释了如何将其用于资产管理中的许多应用,例如为投资组合生成风险情景,为多资产衍生品定价,回溯测试投资策略,以及对冲依赖相关性的投资策略和金融产品。作者在一个机器学习案例研究中展示了矩阵进化的潜在应用,该案例研究用于多资产领域的鲁棒投资组合构建,该案例展示了一个可解释的机器学习程序是如何在1月5日,2月21日,2011年。2002年8月1日,我和我的朋友们来到了洛杉矶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信