Relationship between physical activity and trajectories of anxiety and depression scores in college students

Guo Hongbo, Wang Xiangying, Ban Mengjiao
{"title":"Relationship between physical activity and trajectories of anxiety and depression scores in college students","authors":"Guo Hongbo, Wang Xiangying, Ban Mengjiao","doi":"10.16835/J.CNKI.1000-9817.2020.11.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To investigate the relationship between different physical activity pattern and trajectories of anxiety and depression scores in college students, and to provide evidence for exploring the influence of physical activity on the development of anxiety and depression. Methods A total of 1 265 college students from grade 2017 in a comprehensive university were investigated longitudinally for five times through stratified cluster sampling. Physical Activity Rank Scale-3 (PARS-3), Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) were used, and latent class linear mixed models (LCLMM) were used to identify the trajectories of anxiety and depression scores and multinomial Logistic regression models were used for exploring the relationship between small persistent status of physical activity among the five surveys and subgroups of trajectory and anxiety and depression scores. Results A total of 940(74.3%) college students were indentified as low persistent physical activity group and 325 (25.7%) of them were identified as moderatre-to-high persistent physical activity group. The trajectories of anxiety score were classified into three groups: low level group, high level-decreasing group, and high level group. The number and proportion of the three groups were 686(54.2%), 144(11.4%), 435(34.4%), respectively. The trajectories of depression score were classified into four groups: low level group, moderate level-decreasing group, moderate level-increasing group, and high level group. The number and proportion of the five groups were 604(47.8%), 170 (13.4%), 177 (14.0%), 314(24.8%), respectively. Compared to the students with moderate-to-high persistent physical activity, higher persistent physical activity was associated with higher risk of keeping anxiety score at a high level ( OR = 1.78), and higher odds of decreasing depression score at moderate level ( OR = 0.67), as well as with higher risk of increasing depression score from a moderate level ( OR = 1.79), and increase the risk of keeping depression score at a high level ( OR = 1.97) ( P <0.05). Conclusion Low persistent physical activity of college students could increase the risk of anxiety and depression at a high level. Relevant departments in universities should encourage students to take part in physical activity, with special focus given to individuals with less amount of physical activity and take effective interventional measures to modify the development of anxiety and depression. 【摘要】 目的 分析不同运动量的体育活动持续状态与焦虑、抑郁评分变化轨迹之间的关联, 为更好认识体育活动对大 学生焦虑、抑郁发展情况的影响提供参考。 方法 采用分层整群抽样法, 对山东省某综合性大学 2017 级 1 265 名学生进 行 5 次随访, 使用体育活动等级量表、焦虑自评量表、抑郁自评量表进行问卷调査, 并通过潜在类线性混合模型识别焦虑、 抑郁评分变化轨迹, 采用无序多分类 Logistic 回归分析 5 次调査小运动量的体育活动持续状态与焦虑和抑郁评分变化轨迹 之间的关联。 结果 每次均为小运动量者 940 名 (74.3%), 每次均为中等或大运动量者 325 名 (25.7%)。焦虑评分变化轨 迹被分为低水平组、髙水平-下降组、髙水平组, 分别为 686 (54.2%)、144 (11.4%)、435 (34.4%) 名;抑郁评分变化轨迹被分 为低水平组、中水平-下降组、髙水平组、中水平-上升组, 分别为 604 (47.8%)、170 (13.4%)、177 (14.0%)、314 (24.8%) 名。 以中等或大运动量学生作为参照, 持续为小运动量状态会增加焦虑保持在髙水平的风险 ( OR =1.78)、使抑郁评分在中等水 平继续降低的可能性降低 ( OR = 0.67)、增加抑郁评分从中等水平继续升髙 ( OR =1.79) 和持续保持在髙水平的风险 ( OR = 1.97) ( P 值均<0.05)。 结论 大学生持续小运动量状态会增加焦虑、抑郁髙水平的风险。应倡导大学生积极参与体育锻 炼, 关注日常体育活动量较少个体的心理健康状况。","PeriodicalId":106801,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of School Health","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of School Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16835/J.CNKI.1000-9817.2020.11.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective To investigate the relationship between different physical activity pattern and trajectories of anxiety and depression scores in college students, and to provide evidence for exploring the influence of physical activity on the development of anxiety and depression. Methods A total of 1 265 college students from grade 2017 in a comprehensive university were investigated longitudinally for five times through stratified cluster sampling. Physical Activity Rank Scale-3 (PARS-3), Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) were used, and latent class linear mixed models (LCLMM) were used to identify the trajectories of anxiety and depression scores and multinomial Logistic regression models were used for exploring the relationship between small persistent status of physical activity among the five surveys and subgroups of trajectory and anxiety and depression scores. Results A total of 940(74.3%) college students were indentified as low persistent physical activity group and 325 (25.7%) of them were identified as moderatre-to-high persistent physical activity group. The trajectories of anxiety score were classified into three groups: low level group, high level-decreasing group, and high level group. The number and proportion of the three groups were 686(54.2%), 144(11.4%), 435(34.4%), respectively. The trajectories of depression score were classified into four groups: low level group, moderate level-decreasing group, moderate level-increasing group, and high level group. The number and proportion of the five groups were 604(47.8%), 170 (13.4%), 177 (14.0%), 314(24.8%), respectively. Compared to the students with moderate-to-high persistent physical activity, higher persistent physical activity was associated with higher risk of keeping anxiety score at a high level ( OR = 1.78), and higher odds of decreasing depression score at moderate level ( OR = 0.67), as well as with higher risk of increasing depression score from a moderate level ( OR = 1.79), and increase the risk of keeping depression score at a high level ( OR = 1.97) ( P <0.05). Conclusion Low persistent physical activity of college students could increase the risk of anxiety and depression at a high level. Relevant departments in universities should encourage students to take part in physical activity, with special focus given to individuals with less amount of physical activity and take effective interventional measures to modify the development of anxiety and depression. 【摘要】 目的 分析不同运动量的体育活动持续状态与焦虑、抑郁评分变化轨迹之间的关联, 为更好认识体育活动对大 学生焦虑、抑郁发展情况的影响提供参考。 方法 采用分层整群抽样法, 对山东省某综合性大学 2017 级 1 265 名学生进 行 5 次随访, 使用体育活动等级量表、焦虑自评量表、抑郁自评量表进行问卷调査, 并通过潜在类线性混合模型识别焦虑、 抑郁评分变化轨迹, 采用无序多分类 Logistic 回归分析 5 次调査小运动量的体育活动持续状态与焦虑和抑郁评分变化轨迹 之间的关联。 结果 每次均为小运动量者 940 名 (74.3%), 每次均为中等或大运动量者 325 名 (25.7%)。焦虑评分变化轨 迹被分为低水平组、髙水平-下降组、髙水平组, 分别为 686 (54.2%)、144 (11.4%)、435 (34.4%) 名;抑郁评分变化轨迹被分 为低水平组、中水平-下降组、髙水平组、中水平-上升组, 分别为 604 (47.8%)、170 (13.4%)、177 (14.0%)、314 (24.8%) 名。 以中等或大运动量学生作为参照, 持续为小运动量状态会增加焦虑保持在髙水平的风险 ( OR =1.78)、使抑郁评分在中等水 平继续降低的可能性降低 ( OR = 0.67)、增加抑郁评分从中等水平继续升髙 ( OR =1.79) 和持续保持在髙水平的风险 ( OR = 1.97) ( P 值均<0.05)。 结论 大学生持续小运动量状态会增加焦虑、抑郁髙水平的风险。应倡导大学生积极参与体育锻 炼, 关注日常体育活动量较少个体的心理健康状况。
大学生体育活动与焦虑、抑郁得分轨迹的关系
目的探讨不同体育活动方式与大学生焦虑、抑郁得分轨迹的关系,为探讨体育活动对焦虑、抑郁发展的影响提供依据。方法采用分层整群抽样的方法,对某综合性大学2017级1 265名大学生进行5次纵向调查。采用体育活动等级量表-3 (PARS-3)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS),利用潜类线性混合模型(LCLMM)识别焦虑和抑郁得分的变化轨迹,并利用多项Logistic回归模型探讨5项调查和运动轨迹亚组与焦虑和抑郁得分之间的关系。结果940名大学生(74.3%)为低持续体力活动组,325名大学生(25.7%)为中高持续体力活动组。焦虑得分轨迹分为三组:低水平组、高水平下降组和高水平组。三组患者人数和比例分别为686例(54.2%)、144例(11.4%)、435例(34.4%)。抑郁得分轨迹分为4组:低水平组、中度下降组、中度升高组和高水平组。5组患者数量和比例分别为604例(47.8%)、170例(13.4%)、177例(14.0%)、314例(24.8%)。moderate-to-high持续身体活动的学生相比,高持续身体活动与焦虑分数保持在高水平的风险更高(或= 1.78),和更高的几率减少抑郁得分中等水平(或= 0.67),以及从适度增加抑郁的风险更高的分数(或= 1.79),得分和增加患抑郁症的风险保持在一个高水平(或= 1.97)(P < 0.05)。结论低持续性体育活动可显著增加大学生焦虑、抑郁的发生风险。高校有关部门应鼓励学生参加体育活动,特别关注体育活动量较少的个体,并采取有效的干预措施,改变焦虑和抑郁的发展。【摘要】 目的 分析不同运动量的体育活动持续状态与焦虑、抑郁评分变化轨迹之间的关联, 为更好认识体育活动对大 学生焦虑、抑郁发展情况的影响提供参考。 方法采用分层整群抽样法,对山东省某综合性大学2017级265名学生进行5次随访,使用体育活动等级量表,焦虑自评量表,抑郁自评量表进行问卷调査,并通过潜在类线性混合模型识别焦虑,抑郁评分变化轨迹,采用无序多分类物流回归分析5次调査小运动量的体育活动持续状态与焦虑和抑郁评分变化轨迹之间的关联。结果每次均为小运动量者940名(74.3%),每次均为中等或大运动量者325名(25.7%)。焦虑评分变化轨迹被分为低水平组,髙水平,下降组,髙水平组,分别为686(54.2%)、144年(11.4%)、435(34.4%)名;抑郁评分变化轨迹被分为低水平组,中水平,下降组,髙水平组,中水平,上升组,分别为604(47.8%)、170年(13.4%)、177(14.0%)、314(24.8%)名。以中等或大运动量学生作为参照,持续为小运动量状态会增加焦虑保持在髙水平的风险(或= 1.78),使抑郁评分在中等水平继续降低的可能性降低(或= 0.67),增加抑郁评分从中等水平继续升髙(或= 1.79)和持续保持在髙水平的风险(或= 1.97)(P值均< 0.05)。结论 大学生持续小运动量状态会增加焦虑、抑郁髙水平的风险。应倡导大学生积极参与体育锻 炼, 关注日常体育活动量较少个体的心理健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信