Which Courts Deliver Most Corporate Law Judgments? A Research Note

I. Ramsay, Are Watne
{"title":"Which Courts Deliver Most Corporate Law Judgments? A Research Note","authors":"I. Ramsay, Are Watne","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1168057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Australia, plaintiffs in civil corporate law matters are generally free to choose between the Federal Court and a state or territory Supreme Court when commencing litigation. This research note outlines the results of research undertaken by the authors indicating which courts deliver most corporate law judgments. The research indicates the states where the Federal Court has had the most impact in recent years in terms of hearing corporate law matters that could have gone to a state Supreme Court. Data is also presented on the numbers of hearing days relating to the judgments. Possible explanations for the differences in the numbers of judgments delivered are explored. One possible explanation is that there are more companies registered in those states which have the courts delivering the most judgments. The data does not support this explanation. However, there is a significant difference between the registrations of all companies and where the top 150 Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) listed companies (measured by market capitalisation) are registered. This data might provide a possible explanation for some of the differences between the courts in terms of the numbers of judgments delivered because it might be expected that the top 150 companies, because of their size and the extent of their operations, are more involved in litigation than smaller companies. The advantages of allowing plaintiffs to choose between courts when commencing corporate law litigation are discussed. The note concludes with discussion of whether courts compete for corporate law litigation and what might be the incentives to compete.","PeriodicalId":114900,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1168057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Australia, plaintiffs in civil corporate law matters are generally free to choose between the Federal Court and a state or territory Supreme Court when commencing litigation. This research note outlines the results of research undertaken by the authors indicating which courts deliver most corporate law judgments. The research indicates the states where the Federal Court has had the most impact in recent years in terms of hearing corporate law matters that could have gone to a state Supreme Court. Data is also presented on the numbers of hearing days relating to the judgments. Possible explanations for the differences in the numbers of judgments delivered are explored. One possible explanation is that there are more companies registered in those states which have the courts delivering the most judgments. The data does not support this explanation. However, there is a significant difference between the registrations of all companies and where the top 150 Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) listed companies (measured by market capitalisation) are registered. This data might provide a possible explanation for some of the differences between the courts in terms of the numbers of judgments delivered because it might be expected that the top 150 companies, because of their size and the extent of their operations, are more involved in litigation than smaller companies. The advantages of allowing plaintiffs to choose between courts when commencing corporate law litigation are discussed. The note concludes with discussion of whether courts compete for corporate law litigation and what might be the incentives to compete.
哪些法院做出最多的公司法判决?研究报告
在澳大利亚,民事公司法案件的原告在提起诉讼时通常可以自由选择联邦法院和州或地区最高法院。本研究说明概述了作者进行的研究结果,指出哪些法院作出了大多数公司法判决。这项研究指出,联邦法院近年来在审理本可交由州最高法院审理的公司法案件方面影响力最大的州。还提供了与判决有关的听审日数的数据。对判决数量差异的可能解释进行了探讨。一种可能的解释是,在那些法院做出最多判决的州注册的公司更多。数据并不支持这种解释。然而,所有公司的注册与澳大利亚证券交易所(ASX)前150家上市公司(按市值衡量)的注册之间存在显著差异。这一数据可能为法院之间在判决数量上的一些差异提供了可能的解释,因为可以预期,排名前150位的公司,由于其规模和经营范围,比较小的公司更多地涉及诉讼。讨论了允许原告在提起公司法诉讼时选择法院的好处。该说明最后讨论了法院是否会为公司法诉讼而竞争,以及竞争的动机可能是什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信