Towards a unified theory of GNSS ambiguity resolution

P. Teunissen
{"title":"Towards a unified theory of GNSS ambiguity resolution","authors":"P. Teunissen","doi":"10.5081/JGPS.6.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this invited contribution a brief review will be presented of the integer estimation theory as developed by the author over the last decade and which started with the introduction of the LAMBDA method in 1993. The re- view discusses three different, but closely related classes of ambiguity estimators. They are the integer estimators, the integer aperture estimators and the integer equivariant estimators. Integer estimators are integer aperture estima- tors and integer aperture estimators are integer equivari- ant estimators. The reverse is not necessarily true how- ever. Thus of the three types of estimators the integer es- timators are the most restrictive. Their pull-in regions are translational invariant, disjunct and they cover the ambi- guity space completely. Well-known examples are integer rounding, integer bootstrapping and integer least-squares. A less restrictive class of estimators is the class of inte- ger aperture estimators. Their pull-in regions only obey two of the three conditions. They are still translational invariant and disjunct, but they do not need to cover the ambiguity space completely. As a consequence the inte- ger aperture estimators are of a hybrid nature having either integer or non-integer outcomes. Examples of integer aper- ture estimators are the ratio-testimator and the difference- testimator. The class of integer equivariant estimators is the less restrictive of the three classes. These estimators only obey one of the three conditions, namely the condi- tion of being translational invariant. As a consequence the outcomes of integer equivariant estimators are always real- valued. For each of the three classes of estimators we also present the optimal estimator. Although the Gaussian case is usually assumed, the results are presented for an arbi- trary probability density function of the float solution. The optimal integer estimator in the Gaussian case is the inte- ger least-squares estimator. The optimality criterion used is that of maximizing the probability of correct integer es- timation, the so-called success rate. The optimal integer aperture estimator in the Gaussian case is the one which only returns the integer least-squares solution when the in- teger least-squares residual resides in the optimal aperture pull-in region. This region is governed by the probability density function of the float solution and by the probabil- ity density function of the integer least-squares residual. The aperture of the pull-in region is governed by a user- defined aperture parameter. The optimality criterion used is that of maximizing the probability of correct integer esti- mation given a fixed, user-defined, probability of incorrect integer estimation. The optimal integer aperture estimator becomes identical to the optimal integer estimator in case the success rate and the fail rate sum up to one. The best integer equivariant estimator is an infinite weighted sum of all integers. The weights are determined as ratios of the probability density function of the float so- lution with its train of integer shifted copies. The optimal- ity criterion used is that of minimizing the mean squared error. The best integer equivariant estimator therefore al- ways outperforms the float solution in terms of precision.","PeriodicalId":237555,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Positioning Systems","volume":"50 10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Positioning Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5081/JGPS.6.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

In this invited contribution a brief review will be presented of the integer estimation theory as developed by the author over the last decade and which started with the introduction of the LAMBDA method in 1993. The re- view discusses three different, but closely related classes of ambiguity estimators. They are the integer estimators, the integer aperture estimators and the integer equivariant estimators. Integer estimators are integer aperture estima- tors and integer aperture estimators are integer equivari- ant estimators. The reverse is not necessarily true how- ever. Thus of the three types of estimators the integer es- timators are the most restrictive. Their pull-in regions are translational invariant, disjunct and they cover the ambi- guity space completely. Well-known examples are integer rounding, integer bootstrapping and integer least-squares. A less restrictive class of estimators is the class of inte- ger aperture estimators. Their pull-in regions only obey two of the three conditions. They are still translational invariant and disjunct, but they do not need to cover the ambiguity space completely. As a consequence the inte- ger aperture estimators are of a hybrid nature having either integer or non-integer outcomes. Examples of integer aper- ture estimators are the ratio-testimator and the difference- testimator. The class of integer equivariant estimators is the less restrictive of the three classes. These estimators only obey one of the three conditions, namely the condi- tion of being translational invariant. As a consequence the outcomes of integer equivariant estimators are always real- valued. For each of the three classes of estimators we also present the optimal estimator. Although the Gaussian case is usually assumed, the results are presented for an arbi- trary probability density function of the float solution. The optimal integer estimator in the Gaussian case is the inte- ger least-squares estimator. The optimality criterion used is that of maximizing the probability of correct integer es- timation, the so-called success rate. The optimal integer aperture estimator in the Gaussian case is the one which only returns the integer least-squares solution when the in- teger least-squares residual resides in the optimal aperture pull-in region. This region is governed by the probability density function of the float solution and by the probabil- ity density function of the integer least-squares residual. The aperture of the pull-in region is governed by a user- defined aperture parameter. The optimality criterion used is that of maximizing the probability of correct integer esti- mation given a fixed, user-defined, probability of incorrect integer estimation. The optimal integer aperture estimator becomes identical to the optimal integer estimator in case the success rate and the fail rate sum up to one. The best integer equivariant estimator is an infinite weighted sum of all integers. The weights are determined as ratios of the probability density function of the float so- lution with its train of integer shifted copies. The optimal- ity criterion used is that of minimizing the mean squared error. The best integer equivariant estimator therefore al- ways outperforms the float solution in terms of precision.
GNSS模糊度解决的统一理论研究
在这篇特邀文章中,将简要回顾作者在过去十年中发展起来的整数估计理论,并从1993年引入LAMBDA方法开始。本文讨论了三种不同但密切相关的模糊估计器。它们是整数估计量、整数孔径估计量和整数等变估计量。整数估计量是整数孔径估计量,整数孔径估计量是整数等变估计量。反之则不一定正确。因此,在三种类型的估计中,整数估计是最具限制性的。它们的拉入区域是平移不变的、不相交的,并且完全覆盖了模糊空间。众所周知的例子有整数舍入、整数自举和整数最小二乘。一类限制较少的估计量是整数孔径估计量。它们的牵引区域只服从三个条件中的两个。它们仍然是平移不变的和分析的,但它们不需要完全覆盖歧义空间。因此,整数孔径估计量是具有整数或非整数结果的混合性质。整数结构估计量的例子有比值估计量和差值估计量。整数等变估计量是这三类中限制较小的一类。这些估计量只满足三个条件中的一个,即平移不变的条件。因此,整数等变估计的结果总是实值的。对于每一类估计量,我们也给出了最优估计量。虽然通常假设为高斯情况,但结果是针对浮点解的任意概率密度函数提出的。在高斯情况下,最优整数估计量是整数最小二乘估计量。所使用的最优性准则是使正确整数估计的概率最大化,即所谓的成功率。高斯情况下最优整数孔径估计量是当整数最小二乘残差位于最优孔径拉入区域时,只返回整数最小二乘解的估计量。该区域由浮点解的概率密度函数和整数最小二乘残差的概率密度函数控制。拉入区的孔径由用户定义的孔径参数控制。所使用的最优性准则是在给定一个固定的、用户自定义的整数估计错误概率的情况下,使正确整数估计的概率最大化。当成功率和失败率之和等于1时,最优整数孔径估计量与最优整数孔径估计量相等。最佳整数等变估计量是所有整数的无限加权和。权重由浮点数的概率密度函数与其整数移位拷贝序列之比确定。所使用的最优准则是使均方误差最小。因此,最佳整数等变估计器在精度方面总是优于浮点解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信