Teamwork attitudes, interest and self-efficacy between online and face-to-face information technology students

A. Konak, S. Kulturel-Konak, Gordon W. Cheung
{"title":"Teamwork attitudes, interest and self-efficacy between online and face-to-face information technology students","authors":"A. Konak, S. Kulturel-Konak, Gordon W. Cheung","doi":"10.1108/TPM-05-2018-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeChallenges of teamwork in online classes may adversely affect students’ future attitudes toward teamwork. Further, there is a concern about whether online programs foster students’ teamwork skills. To answer these questions, the purpose of this paper is to compare online and face-to-face students’ attitudes toward teamwork, interest in learning teamwork skills and teamwork self-efficacy.Design/methodology/approachThe authors developed a conceptual model explaining how students’ background, engagement in learning teamwork, teamwork self-efficacy and interest in learning teamwork affect attitudes toward teamwork and rigorously tested the model for a meaningful comparison between online and face-to-face students. Attitudes toward teamwork, teamwork interest and teamwork self-efficacy of 582 online and face-to-face students who attend the same academic program were compared.FindingsThe results suggest that online students have less positive attitudes towards teamwork compared to face-to-face students although online students have a higher level of teamwork self-efficacy. Therefore, online students’ relative less positive attitudes toward teamwork cannot be explained by the lack of engagement, teamwork skills or interest.Research limitations/implicationsThe homogeneity of the sample population is one of the limitations of the paper although it provides the opportunity for a comparative study of online and face-to-face students by controlling the majors.Practical implicationsInstructors should evaluate the appropriateness of team assignments while incorporating teamwork in online classes.Originality/valueConcerns about online teamwork are discussed but have not been rigorously investigated in the literature. The authors conducted a comprehensive study involving 582 undergraduate students. The findings of this paper suggest that new approaches are needed to incorporate teamwork in online classes. The results also show that importance of building teamwork self-efficacy.","PeriodicalId":150524,"journal":{"name":"Team Performance Management: An International Journal","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Team Performance Management: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-05-2018-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

PurposeChallenges of teamwork in online classes may adversely affect students’ future attitudes toward teamwork. Further, there is a concern about whether online programs foster students’ teamwork skills. To answer these questions, the purpose of this paper is to compare online and face-to-face students’ attitudes toward teamwork, interest in learning teamwork skills and teamwork self-efficacy.Design/methodology/approachThe authors developed a conceptual model explaining how students’ background, engagement in learning teamwork, teamwork self-efficacy and interest in learning teamwork affect attitudes toward teamwork and rigorously tested the model for a meaningful comparison between online and face-to-face students. Attitudes toward teamwork, teamwork interest and teamwork self-efficacy of 582 online and face-to-face students who attend the same academic program were compared.FindingsThe results suggest that online students have less positive attitudes towards teamwork compared to face-to-face students although online students have a higher level of teamwork self-efficacy. Therefore, online students’ relative less positive attitudes toward teamwork cannot be explained by the lack of engagement, teamwork skills or interest.Research limitations/implicationsThe homogeneity of the sample population is one of the limitations of the paper although it provides the opportunity for a comparative study of online and face-to-face students by controlling the majors.Practical implicationsInstructors should evaluate the appropriateness of team assignments while incorporating teamwork in online classes.Originality/valueConcerns about online teamwork are discussed but have not been rigorously investigated in the literature. The authors conducted a comprehensive study involving 582 undergraduate students. The findings of this paper suggest that new approaches are needed to incorporate teamwork in online classes. The results also show that importance of building teamwork self-efficacy.
网络与面对面信息技术学生的团队合作态度、兴趣与自我效能感
目的网络课堂中团队合作的挑战可能会对学生未来对团队合作的态度产生负面影响。此外,人们还担心在线课程是否能培养学生的团队合作能力。为了回答这些问题,本文的目的是比较在线和面对面学生对团队合作的态度、学习团队合作技能的兴趣和团队合作自我效能感。作者开发了一个概念模型,解释学生的背景、学习团队合作的参与度、团队合作自我效能感和学习团队合作的兴趣如何影响对团队合作的态度,并对该模型进行了严格的测试,以便在在线和面对面的学生之间进行有意义的比较。比较了582名参加同一学术项目的在线和面授学生的团队合作态度、团队合作兴趣和团队合作自我效能感。结果表明,与面对面的学生相比,在线学生对团队合作的积极态度较差,尽管在线学生的团队合作自我效能水平较高。因此,网络学生对团队合作相对不积极的态度不能用缺乏投入、团队合作技能或兴趣来解释。研究的局限性/意义样本人口的同质性是本文的局限性之一,尽管它通过控制专业为在线和面对面学生的比较研究提供了机会。在将团队合作纳入在线课堂时,教师应评估团队作业的适当性。原创性/价值对在线团队合作的关注进行了讨论,但尚未在文献中进行严格的调查。作者对582名本科生进行了一项全面的研究。本文的研究结果表明,需要新的方法来将团队合作纳入在线课程。研究结果还显示了团队自我效能感的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信