F. Erfanian, R. L. Roudsari, A. Heydari, M. Bahmani
{"title":"A Narrative on Using Vignettes: Its Advantages and Drawbacks","authors":"F. Erfanian, R. L. Roudsari, A. Heydari, M. Bahmani","doi":"10.22038/JMRH.2020.41650.1472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & aim: In some situations in quantitative or qualitative research, complementary tools would be of great help in data collection. Vignette technique is a data collection tool, which has been used for over 50 years in different disciplines including health sciences. Nonetheless, there is a paucity of information regarding this method. With this background in mind, the present review aimed to provide thorough information about the vignette technique. Methods: This was a narrative review conducted through searching of databases of ISI Web of Science (65), PubMed (27), Scopus (24), CINAHL (110), ProQuest (23), ERIC (44) as well as Science Direct (123) using keywords including “vignette”, “qualitative research”, “quantitative research”, and \"research” from their inception to September, 2018 to assess those studies regarding different aspects of vignettes. Out of 416 documents, a number of 105 books and articles were reviewed regarding the different aspects of the vignettes. No language restrictions were imposed. Results: Vignettes are used in different forms including text, illustrations, images, videotape and cartoons, computer-based data, and music as an elicitation tool to provide supplementary and complementary data during a research process. Using this technique, the researcher can collect some data which is not accessible through other sources. At the same time, the researchers should be cautious about its accurate design and validity to get more realistic data. Conclusion: Vignettes as an effective tool can be employed in both quantitative and qualitative research to collect more diverse and thorough data, particularly, in cross-cultural research.","PeriodicalId":283698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery and reproductive health","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery and reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/JMRH.2020.41650.1472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Abstract
Background & aim: In some situations in quantitative or qualitative research, complementary tools would be of great help in data collection. Vignette technique is a data collection tool, which has been used for over 50 years in different disciplines including health sciences. Nonetheless, there is a paucity of information regarding this method. With this background in mind, the present review aimed to provide thorough information about the vignette technique. Methods: This was a narrative review conducted through searching of databases of ISI Web of Science (65), PubMed (27), Scopus (24), CINAHL (110), ProQuest (23), ERIC (44) as well as Science Direct (123) using keywords including “vignette”, “qualitative research”, “quantitative research”, and "research” from their inception to September, 2018 to assess those studies regarding different aspects of vignettes. Out of 416 documents, a number of 105 books and articles were reviewed regarding the different aspects of the vignettes. No language restrictions were imposed. Results: Vignettes are used in different forms including text, illustrations, images, videotape and cartoons, computer-based data, and music as an elicitation tool to provide supplementary and complementary data during a research process. Using this technique, the researcher can collect some data which is not accessible through other sources. At the same time, the researchers should be cautious about its accurate design and validity to get more realistic data. Conclusion: Vignettes as an effective tool can be employed in both quantitative and qualitative research to collect more diverse and thorough data, particularly, in cross-cultural research.
背景与目的:在定量或定性研究的某些情况下,互补工具将对数据收集有很大帮助。Vignette技术是一种数据收集工具,已在包括健康科学在内的不同学科中使用了50多年。尽管如此,关于这种方法的信息还是很少。考虑到这一背景,本综述旨在提供有关小片段技术的全面信息。方法:通过检索ISI Web of Science(65)、PubMed(27)、Scopus(24)、CINAHL(110)、ProQuest(23)、ERIC(44)和Science Direct(123)数据库,使用关键词“小片段”、“定性研究”、“定量研究”和“研究”,从其成立到2018年9月,对这些关于小片段不同方面的研究进行述评。在416份文件中,就插图的不同方面审查了105本书籍和文章。没有施加语言限制。结果:小插曲以不同的形式使用,包括文本,插图,图像,录像带和漫画,计算机数据,以及作为启发工具的音乐,在研究过程中提供补充和补充数据。使用这种技术,研究人员可以收集一些无法通过其他来源获得的数据。同时,为了获得更真实的数据,研究人员应谨慎对待其设计的准确性和有效性。结论:小插曲作为一种有效的工具,可以在定量和定性研究中使用,以收集更多样化和全面的数据,特别是在跨文化研究中。