EFL Learnersʼ Reading Strategy Use in Relation to Reading Anxiety

Hsin-Yi Lien
{"title":"EFL Learnersʼ Reading Strategy Use in Relation to Reading Anxiety","authors":"Hsin-Yi Lien","doi":"10.5746/LEIA/11/V2/I2/A03/LIEN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study investigated EFL learners’ reading strategies use in relation to reading anxiety and gender after their participation in extensive reading as a supplemental course requirement. One hundred and eight EFL college freshmen completed a questionnaire, a survey of Foreign Language Reading Anxiety Scale (FLRAS), and a modified Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS) after eighteen weeks of participation in extensive reading. The results indicate a negative correlation between reading anxiety and reading strategies. It was also found that EFL learners with low anxiety levels tended to use general reading strategies such as guessing, while EFL learners with high anxiety levels employed basic support mechanisms, such as translation, to help themselves understand texts. Some reading strategies were more used by high-anxiety level readers than low-anxiety level readers. Additionally, females tended to be slightly more anxious than males in reading. Language anxiety, a complex psychological construct, is regarded as an affective variable in the language learning process. Research on language anxiety has examined the possible relationship between anxiety and performance, and its interference in language competence (Horwitz, Horwitz, & Cope, 1986; MacIntyre & Gardner, 1989; Sellers, 2000). The majority of studies have centered on the influence of language anxiety on listening or speaking in language classroom (Horwitz et al., 1986; Phillips, 1992; Price, 1991; Young, 1991). However, anxiety also can be a crucial filter for foreign language (FL) learners as they attempt to comprehend reading or listening passages. The literature on foreign language reading suggests that affective variables such as anxiety could be contributing factors in reading performance (Mohd. Zin & Rafik-Galea, 2010; Saito, Horwitz, & Garza, 1999; Sellers, 2000). In a preliminary study, Saito et al. (1999) indicated that foreign language reading anxiety is distinct from general foreign language anxiety and concluded that learners’ levels of reading anxiety were correlated with","PeriodicalId":263152,"journal":{"name":"Language Education in Asia","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Education in Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5746/LEIA/11/V2/I2/A03/LIEN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

Abstract

The study investigated EFL learners’ reading strategies use in relation to reading anxiety and gender after their participation in extensive reading as a supplemental course requirement. One hundred and eight EFL college freshmen completed a questionnaire, a survey of Foreign Language Reading Anxiety Scale (FLRAS), and a modified Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS) after eighteen weeks of participation in extensive reading. The results indicate a negative correlation between reading anxiety and reading strategies. It was also found that EFL learners with low anxiety levels tended to use general reading strategies such as guessing, while EFL learners with high anxiety levels employed basic support mechanisms, such as translation, to help themselves understand texts. Some reading strategies were more used by high-anxiety level readers than low-anxiety level readers. Additionally, females tended to be slightly more anxious than males in reading. Language anxiety, a complex psychological construct, is regarded as an affective variable in the language learning process. Research on language anxiety has examined the possible relationship between anxiety and performance, and its interference in language competence (Horwitz, Horwitz, & Cope, 1986; MacIntyre & Gardner, 1989; Sellers, 2000). The majority of studies have centered on the influence of language anxiety on listening or speaking in language classroom (Horwitz et al., 1986; Phillips, 1992; Price, 1991; Young, 1991). However, anxiety also can be a crucial filter for foreign language (FL) learners as they attempt to comprehend reading or listening passages. The literature on foreign language reading suggests that affective variables such as anxiety could be contributing factors in reading performance (Mohd. Zin & Rafik-Galea, 2010; Saito, Horwitz, & Garza, 1999; Sellers, 2000). In a preliminary study, Saito et al. (1999) indicated that foreign language reading anxiety is distinct from general foreign language anxiety and concluded that learners’ levels of reading anxiety were correlated with
英语学习者的阅读策略使用与阅读焦虑的关系
本研究调查了英语学习者在参加泛读课后的阅读策略使用与阅读焦虑和性别的关系。118名大学新生在进行了为期18周的泛读后,完成了问卷调查、外语阅读焦虑量表(FLRAS)和修改后的阅读策略调查(sor)。结果表明,阅读焦虑与阅读策略呈负相关。研究还发现,低焦虑水平的英语学习者倾向于使用一般的阅读策略,如猜测,而高焦虑水平的英语学习者则使用基本的支持机制,如翻译来帮助自己理解文本。高焦虑水平的读者比低焦虑水平的读者使用更多的阅读策略。此外,女性在阅读时的焦虑程度略高于男性。语言焦虑是一种复杂的心理结构,是语言学习过程中的一个情感变量。对语言焦虑的研究考察了焦虑与表现之间的可能关系,以及焦虑对语言能力的干扰(Horwitz, Horwitz, & Cope, 1986;麦金太尔&加德纳,1989;卖家,2000)。大多数研究集中在语言焦虑对语言课堂听说的影响上(Horwitz et al., 1986;菲利普斯,1992;价格,1991;年轻,1991)。然而,当外语学习者试图理解阅读或听力段落时,焦虑也可能是一个至关重要的过滤器。有关外语阅读的文献表明,焦虑等情感变量可能是影响阅读表现的因素(Mohd。Zin & Rafik-Galea, 2010;Saito, Horwitz, & Garza, 1999;卖家,2000)。Saito et al.(1999)在一项初步研究中指出外语阅读焦虑不同于一般的外语焦虑,并得出学习者的阅读焦虑水平与一般的外语焦虑相关的结论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信