A Method to Evaluate Binary Code Comparison Tools

Mariam Arutunian, Hripsime Hovhannisyan, V. Vardanyan, S. Sargsyan, S. Kurmangaleev, H. Aslanyan
{"title":"A Method to Evaluate Binary Code Comparison Tools","authors":"Mariam Arutunian, Hripsime Hovhannisyan, V. Vardanyan, S. Sargsyan, S. Kurmangaleev, H. Aslanyan","doi":"10.1109/ivmem53963.2021.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Binary code comparison tools are widely used to analyze vulnerabilities, search for malicious code, detect copyright violations, etc. The article discusses three tools - BCC, BinDiff, Diaphora. Those are based on static analysis of programs. The tools receive as input data two versions of the program in binary form and match their functions. The purpose of the article is to assess the quality of the tools. We developed a testing system to automatically determine the precision and recall of each instrument. F1 score on the developed testing system for BCC instrument is 85.6%, for BinDiff - 82.4%, for Diaphora - 64.7%.","PeriodicalId":360766,"journal":{"name":"2021 Ivannikov Memorial Workshop (IVMEM)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Ivannikov Memorial Workshop (IVMEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ivmem53963.2021.00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Binary code comparison tools are widely used to analyze vulnerabilities, search for malicious code, detect copyright violations, etc. The article discusses three tools - BCC, BinDiff, Diaphora. Those are based on static analysis of programs. The tools receive as input data two versions of the program in binary form and match their functions. The purpose of the article is to assess the quality of the tools. We developed a testing system to automatically determine the precision and recall of each instrument. F1 score on the developed testing system for BCC instrument is 85.6%, for BinDiff - 82.4%, for Diaphora - 64.7%.
一种评估二进制代码比较工具的方法
二进制代码比较工具被广泛用于分析漏洞、搜索恶意代码、检测侵犯版权等。本文讨论了三种工具- BCC, BinDiff, Diaphora。这些都是基于程序的静态分析。这些工具以二进制形式接收程序的两个版本作为输入数据,并匹配它们的函数。本文的目的是评估工具的质量。我们开发了一个测试系统,可以自动确定每种仪器的精度和召回率。开发的BCC仪器检测系统F1评分为85.6%,BinDiff为82.4%,Diaphora为64.7%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信