{"title":"Retrospective analysis of open globe injuries during coronavirus disease-19 lockdown in Turkey","authors":"Zeynep Akgün","doi":"10.14744/eer.2021.69775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The objective of the study was to evaluate open globe injuries and injury type, injury grade, and demographic characteristics of patients with penetrating eye injury during the coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 lockdown in Turkey. Methods: Patients who were admitted to our clinic with a diagnosis of penetrating/perforating eye injury between March 11, 2020–June 1, 2020 (Group 1), and March 11, 2019–June 01, 2019 (Group 2), were retrospectively analyzed. Ophthalmologic examination findings, ocular trauma score (OTS), causes of injury, and mechanism of injury were recorded. Data and findings were compared with SPSS. Results: A total of 47 (1.74%) of 2688 patients in 2019 and 21 of 1130 patients (1.85%) in 2020 referred to our clinic from the emergency department were hospitalized with the diagnosis of penetrating/perforating eye injury. There was no difference between the groups in terms of age and gender (p=0.60 and p=0.73, respectively). The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the first examination was 1.46±1.0.9 (0–3.5) log MAR in Group 1 and 1.09±1.05 (0–3.5) log MAR in Group 2 (p=0.19). The mean OTS was calculated as 56.00±25.96 (12–100) in Group 1 and 69.63±23.78 (13–100) in Group 2. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.05). Final BCVA was 1.31±0.91 (0–3) log MAR in Group 1 and 0.53±0.77 (0–3) log MAR in Group 2 (p=0.005). Conclusion: During the COVID-19 lockdown, there was a significant decrease in emergency consultations and penetrating injuries. The OTS and final BCVA of patients were lower than the previous year. COVID-19 locking may have an effect on the reduction of ocular trauma.","PeriodicalId":350672,"journal":{"name":"European Eye Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Eye Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eer.2021.69775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of the study was to evaluate open globe injuries and injury type, injury grade, and demographic characteristics of patients with penetrating eye injury during the coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 lockdown in Turkey. Methods: Patients who were admitted to our clinic with a diagnosis of penetrating/perforating eye injury between March 11, 2020–June 1, 2020 (Group 1), and March 11, 2019–June 01, 2019 (Group 2), were retrospectively analyzed. Ophthalmologic examination findings, ocular trauma score (OTS), causes of injury, and mechanism of injury were recorded. Data and findings were compared with SPSS. Results: A total of 47 (1.74%) of 2688 patients in 2019 and 21 of 1130 patients (1.85%) in 2020 referred to our clinic from the emergency department were hospitalized with the diagnosis of penetrating/perforating eye injury. There was no difference between the groups in terms of age and gender (p=0.60 and p=0.73, respectively). The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the first examination was 1.46±1.0.9 (0–3.5) log MAR in Group 1 and 1.09±1.05 (0–3.5) log MAR in Group 2 (p=0.19). The mean OTS was calculated as 56.00±25.96 (12–100) in Group 1 and 69.63±23.78 (13–100) in Group 2. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.05). Final BCVA was 1.31±0.91 (0–3) log MAR in Group 1 and 0.53±0.77 (0–3) log MAR in Group 2 (p=0.005). Conclusion: During the COVID-19 lockdown, there was a significant decrease in emergency consultations and penetrating injuries. The OTS and final BCVA of patients were lower than the previous year. COVID-19 locking may have an effect on the reduction of ocular trauma.
目的:本研究的目的是评估土耳其冠状病毒病(COVID)-19封锁期间开放性眼球损伤、损伤类型、损伤等级和穿透性眼损伤患者的人口统计学特征。方法:回顾性分析2020年3月11日- 2020年6月1日(第1组)和2019年3月11日- 2019年6月1日(第2组)期间在我院就诊的诊断为穿透/穿孔性眼损伤的患者。记录眼科检查结果、眼外伤评分(OTS)、损伤原因及损伤机制。数据与结果用SPSS进行比较。结果:2019年急诊转至我院2688例患者中有47例(1.74%),2020年1130例患者中有21例(1.85%)诊断为穿透/穿孔性眼损伤住院。在年龄和性别方面各组间无差异(p=0.60和p=0.73)。第一次检查时,第一组的平均最佳矫正视力(BCVA)为1.46±1.0.9 (0-3.5)log MAR,第二组为1.09±1.05 (0-3.5)log MAR (p=0.19)。1组平均OTS为56.00±25.96(12-100),2组平均OTS为69.63±23.78(13-100)。差异有统计学意义(p=0.05)。1组的最终BCVA为1.31±0.91 (0-3)log MAR, 2组为0.53±0.77 (0-3)log MAR (p=0.005)。结论:疫情防控期间,急诊就诊和穿透性损伤明显减少。患者的OTS和最终BCVA均低于上年。COVID-19锁定可能对减少眼外伤有影响。