Dampak Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning (POGIL) terhadap Pengetahuan Metakognitif Siswa pada Topik Asam-Basa

Ivan Ashif Ardhana
{"title":"Dampak Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning (POGIL) terhadap Pengetahuan Metakognitif Siswa pada Topik Asam-Basa","authors":"Ivan Ashif Ardhana","doi":"10.33394/hjkk.v8i1.2545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim of this research is to investigate different impact of Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning (POGIL) and verification as learning approach at senior high school students’ metacognitive knowledge grade XI program IPA on acid-base topic. Research design used was quasi experimental. Hypothesis testing uses t-test with 5% (0,05) significance utilizing SPSS 21 application. Results show that (1) there is significance difference of students’ metacognitive knowledge that is taught by POGIL approach and verification, and (2) students that are taught by POGIL approach give better answer’s pattern of declarative, procedural, and conditional knowledge than students that are taught by verification approach.","PeriodicalId":346446,"journal":{"name":"Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v8i1.2545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim of this research is to investigate different impact of Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning (POGIL) and verification as learning approach at senior high school students’ metacognitive knowledge grade XI program IPA on acid-base topic. Research design used was quasi experimental. Hypothesis testing uses t-test with 5% (0,05) significance utilizing SPSS 21 application. Results show that (1) there is significance difference of students’ metacognitive knowledge that is taught by POGIL approach and verification, and (2) students that are taught by POGIL approach give better answer’s pattern of declarative, procedural, and conditional knowledge than students that are taught by verification approach.
采用准实验研究设计。假设检验采用5%(0.05)显著性的t检验,采用SPSS 21软件。结果表明:(1)POGIL教学法与验证性教学法在学生的元认知知识上存在显著性差异;(2)POGIL教学法对陈述性、程序性、条理性知识的回答模式优于验证性教学法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信