A structural decomposition analysis of “Latin American decade” for selected countries

E. Tahsin
{"title":"A structural decomposition analysis of “Latin American decade” for selected countries","authors":"E. Tahsin","doi":"10.55493/5004.v13i1.4747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2003-2014 period for Latin America refers to the recent boom period within the growth cycles of the region and is called as “Latin American decade”. Given that, the purpose of the paper is to analyze this specific period based on structural transformation dynamics. In this context, structural decomposition methods are evaluated to outline structural transformation patterns. For this analysis, the Groningen Growth and Development Centre (GGDC) Economic Transformation Database (ETD), which provides annual data on employment and real value added by 12 sub-sectors, is used for 8 LA countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru). The decomposition analysis is applied for three main periods (1990-2018, 1990-2003 and 2003-2014) within the growth cycles of the region. So it is predicted to define whether the “Latin American decade” differs from the previous period, regarding structural dynamics. During the “Latin American decade”, the region has gone commodity-led growth pattern and deindustrialization. Moreover, this pattern is not so homogenous. Specifically, the mining sector and non-tradeable sectors dominate the structural dynamics of some countries. Due to these patterns, the results underlie that productivity gains remained at low levels. Latin American countries need to design growth strategies that focus on escaping from productivity traps.","PeriodicalId":426560,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Empirical Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Empirical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55493/5004.v13i1.4747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2003-2014 period for Latin America refers to the recent boom period within the growth cycles of the region and is called as “Latin American decade”. Given that, the purpose of the paper is to analyze this specific period based on structural transformation dynamics. In this context, structural decomposition methods are evaluated to outline structural transformation patterns. For this analysis, the Groningen Growth and Development Centre (GGDC) Economic Transformation Database (ETD), which provides annual data on employment and real value added by 12 sub-sectors, is used for 8 LA countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru). The decomposition analysis is applied for three main periods (1990-2018, 1990-2003 and 2003-2014) within the growth cycles of the region. So it is predicted to define whether the “Latin American decade” differs from the previous period, regarding structural dynamics. During the “Latin American decade”, the region has gone commodity-led growth pattern and deindustrialization. Moreover, this pattern is not so homogenous. Specifically, the mining sector and non-tradeable sectors dominate the structural dynamics of some countries. Due to these patterns, the results underlie that productivity gains remained at low levels. Latin American countries need to design growth strategies that focus on escaping from productivity traps.
对选定国家的“拉丁美洲十年”进行结构分解分析
2003-2014年是拉丁美洲经济增长周期中最近的繁荣时期,被称为“拉丁美洲十年”。鉴于此,本文的目的是基于结构转型动力学来分析这一特定时期。在这种情况下,评估结构分解方法以概述结构转换模式。该分析使用格罗宁根增长与发展中心(GGDC)经济转型数据库(ETD),该数据库提供了12个分部门的就业和实际增加值的年度数据,用于8个拉美国家(阿根廷、玻利维亚、巴西、智利、哥伦比亚、厄瓜多尔、墨西哥、秘鲁)。对区域增长周期内的三个主要时期(1990-2018年、1990-2003年和2003-2014年)进行了分解分析。因此,预计它将定义“拉丁美洲十年”在结构动态方面是否与前一个时期不同。在“拉丁美洲十年”期间,该区域走向了以商品为主导的增长模式和去工业化。此外,这种模式并不是完全相同的。具体地说,采矿部门和非贸易部门支配着一些国家的结构动态。由于这些模式,结果表明生产率增长仍然处于较低水平。拉美国家需要设计专注于摆脱生产率陷阱的增长战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信