Production, Consumption, and Time Varying Expected Returns

R. Priestley
{"title":"Production, Consumption, and Time Varying Expected Returns","authors":"R. Priestley","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3741925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper develops an empirical test of the q-theory production based asset pricing model. In general equilibrium, with habit utility and adjustment costs of investment, it must be the case that when the consumption surplus predicts stock returns corresponding investment patterns must predict investment returns to the same extent. The no arbitrage condition also implies investment patterns must predict stock returns in the same way as the consumption surplus. Using this insight, we find strong empirical support for the production based model without encountering the difficulties of calculating investment returns. Consequently, previous rejections of the model most likely stem from the failure of one or more of the many assumptions that are needed to construct investment returns.","PeriodicalId":330048,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3741925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper develops an empirical test of the q-theory production based asset pricing model. In general equilibrium, with habit utility and adjustment costs of investment, it must be the case that when the consumption surplus predicts stock returns corresponding investment patterns must predict investment returns to the same extent. The no arbitrage condition also implies investment patterns must predict stock returns in the same way as the consumption surplus. Using this insight, we find strong empirical support for the production based model without encountering the difficulties of calculating investment returns. Consequently, previous rejections of the model most likely stem from the failure of one or more of the many assumptions that are needed to construct investment returns.
生产、消费和随时间变化的预期收益
本文对基于 q 理论的生产型资产定价模型进行了实证检验。在一般均衡条件下,由于存在投资的习惯效用和调整成本,当消费盈余预测股票收益时,相应的投资模式必须在相同程度上预测投资收益。无套利条件也意味着投资模式必须以与消费盈余相同的方式预测股票收益。利用这一洞察力,我们发现基于生产的模型得到了强有力的经验支持,而不会遇到计算投资回报的困难。因此,之前对该模型的否定很可能是由于构建投资回报所需的诸多假设中的一个或多个假设失败所致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信