Transforming Leviathan: Job, Hobbes, Zvyagintsev and Philosophical Progression

Graham C. Goff
{"title":"Transforming Leviathan: Job, Hobbes, Zvyagintsev and Philosophical Progression","authors":"Graham C. Goff","doi":"10.32873/uno.dc.jrf.26.01.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The allegory of Leviathan, the biblical serpent of the seas, has undergone numerous distinct and even antithetical conceptions since its origin in the book of Job. Most prominently, Leviathan was the namesake of Thomas Hobbes’s 1651 political treatise and Andrey Zvyagintsev’s 2014 film of the same name, a damning indictment of Russian corruption. These three iterations underscore the societal transition from the recognition of power as being derived from God to the secularization of power in Hobbes’s philosophy, to the negation of the legitimacy of divine and secular institutional power, in Zvyagintsev’s controversial film. This examination of Leviathan’s three unique iterations elucidates the evolution of philosophy and the solution to a world devoid of authority. An autopsy of Leviathan’s allegorical beached corpse invites the individual to create and recognize their own authority and purpose, thus fabricating a fourth transformation of Leviathan.","PeriodicalId":341268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religion & Film","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religion & Film","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32873/uno.dc.jrf.26.01.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The allegory of Leviathan, the biblical serpent of the seas, has undergone numerous distinct and even antithetical conceptions since its origin in the book of Job. Most prominently, Leviathan was the namesake of Thomas Hobbes’s 1651 political treatise and Andrey Zvyagintsev’s 2014 film of the same name, a damning indictment of Russian corruption. These three iterations underscore the societal transition from the recognition of power as being derived from God to the secularization of power in Hobbes’s philosophy, to the negation of the legitimacy of divine and secular institutional power, in Zvyagintsev’s controversial film. This examination of Leviathan’s three unique iterations elucidates the evolution of philosophy and the solution to a world devoid of authority. An autopsy of Leviathan’s allegorical beached corpse invites the individual to create and recognize their own authority and purpose, thus fabricating a fourth transformation of Leviathan.
改造利维坦:约伯、霍布斯、兹维亚金采夫与哲学进展
《圣经》中大海之蛇利维坦的寓言,自从它起源于《约伯记》以来,经历了许多不同的,甚至是对立的概念。最突出的是,《利维坦》与托马斯·霍布斯(Thomas Hobbes) 1651年的政治论文和安德烈·兹维亚金采夫(Andrey Zvyagintsev) 2014年的同名电影同名,后者是对俄罗斯腐败的谴责。这三次反复强调了社会的转变,从承认权力来自上帝,到霍布斯哲学中权力的世俗化,再到对神圣和世俗机构权力合法性的否定,在兹雅金采夫备受争议的电影中。对利维坦的三次独特迭代的考察阐明了哲学的演变和对一个没有权威的世界的解决方案。对利维坦寓言般的搁浅尸体的解剖邀请个人创造和认识自己的权威和目的,从而编造利维坦的第四次转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信