International Tax Planning: The Preacquisition Surplus Election: More Than Meets the Eye?

Tim Fraser, Jim Samuel
{"title":"International Tax Planning: The Preacquisition Surplus Election: More Than Meets the Eye?","authors":"Tim Fraser, Jim Samuel","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2021.69.2.itp","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regulation 5901(2)(b) permits a corporation resident in Canada (CRIC) to make an election in respect of a dividend paid by a foreign affiliate of the CRIC such that the dividend will be treated as a reduction to the adjusted cost base of the foreign affiliate shares on which it is paid, rather than as a distribution from the foreign affiliate's surplus pools. Making this \"preacquisition surplus election\" is often perceived as a straightforward, and administratively simple, way for the CRIC to ensure that the dividend does not result in the unwanted, and potentially adverse, distribution of the foreign affiliate's surplus pools. However, as this article points out, it is important that a CRIC undertake a detailed analysis before deciding to make the election, in order to avoid potential exposure to unintended consequences.\n\nThis article provides an overview of the legislative history of the election and its underlying policy rationale, and describes the limitations of and restrictions on its use. The authors present some conceptual guidelines (along with examples of their application) for identifying certain circumstances in which the making of the election may be particularly favourable or unfavourable. They also compare and contrast this election with the \"qualifying return of capital\" (QROC) election under subsection 90(3), which may be available in some circumstances as an alternative mechanism for achieving a similar result.","PeriodicalId":375948,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2021.69.2.itp","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regulation 5901(2)(b) permits a corporation resident in Canada (CRIC) to make an election in respect of a dividend paid by a foreign affiliate of the CRIC such that the dividend will be treated as a reduction to the adjusted cost base of the foreign affiliate shares on which it is paid, rather than as a distribution from the foreign affiliate's surplus pools. Making this "preacquisition surplus election" is often perceived as a straightforward, and administratively simple, way for the CRIC to ensure that the dividend does not result in the unwanted, and potentially adverse, distribution of the foreign affiliate's surplus pools. However, as this article points out, it is important that a CRIC undertake a detailed analysis before deciding to make the election, in order to avoid potential exposure to unintended consequences. This article provides an overview of the legislative history of the election and its underlying policy rationale, and describes the limitations of and restrictions on its use. The authors present some conceptual guidelines (along with examples of their application) for identifying certain circumstances in which the making of the election may be particularly favourable or unfavourable. They also compare and contrast this election with the "qualifying return of capital" (QROC) election under subsection 90(3), which may be available in some circumstances as an alternative mechanism for achieving a similar result.
国际税收筹划:收购前盈余选举:不只是表面现象?
第5901(2)(b)条法规允许加拿大居民法团(CRIC)就CRIC的外国附属公司支付的股息进行选择,使股息将被视为支付股息的外国附属公司股份调整后成本基础的减少,而不是作为外国附属公司盈余池的分配。这种“收购前盈余选举”通常被认为是一种直接的、管理上简单的方式,可以让CRIC确保股息不会导致外国子公司盈余池的不必要的、潜在不利的分配。然而,正如本文所指出的,为了避免潜在的意外后果,在决定进行选举之前进行详细的分析是很重要的。本文概述了选举的立法历史及其基本政策依据,并描述了其使用的局限性和限制。作者提出了一些概念性的指导方针(连同其应用的例子),以确定在某些情况下进行选举可能特别有利或不利。他们还将此选举与第90(3)款下的“合格资本回报”(QROC)选举进行比较和对比,在某些情况下,QROC可能是实现类似结果的替代机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信