Comparison of SMOTE Sampling Based Algorithm on Imbalanced Data for Classification of New Student Admissions

Yoga Handoko Agustin, Fitri Nuraeni, D. Kurniadi, Y. Septiana, A. Mulyani, W. Baswardono
{"title":"Comparison of SMOTE Sampling Based Algorithm on Imbalanced Data for Classification of New Student Admissions","authors":"Yoga Handoko Agustin, Fitri Nuraeni, D. Kurniadi, Y. Septiana, A. Mulyani, W. Baswardono","doi":"10.1109/ICISS53185.2021.9533243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the efforts to get quality students is through selection. The selection process must be balanced with a strategy so that the selected students are truly qualified. Classification techniques can be used to see the history of new student admissions who are accepted with the student’s lecture history. There are many classification algorithms that can be used, so comparisons need to be made to see the best performance of the algorithm. The classification algorithm used is Decision Tree C4.5, K-Nearest Neighbor, Naïve Bayes and Neural Network. The data used are 546 records in the imbalanced data category. So we need the Smote algorithm to make the data balanced so as not to result in misclassification. The classification results were tested using the Confusion Matrix, ROC and Geometric Mean (G-Mean) as well as a T-Test. The comparison results show that the best performance is on the K-Nearest Neighbor algorithm with an accuracy value of 84.99%, AUC of 0.700, G-Mean 62.95% and the T-test produces a significant different from other algorithms.","PeriodicalId":220371,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS)","volume":"228 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISS53185.2021.9533243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One of the efforts to get quality students is through selection. The selection process must be balanced with a strategy so that the selected students are truly qualified. Classification techniques can be used to see the history of new student admissions who are accepted with the student’s lecture history. There are many classification algorithms that can be used, so comparisons need to be made to see the best performance of the algorithm. The classification algorithm used is Decision Tree C4.5, K-Nearest Neighbor, Naïve Bayes and Neural Network. The data used are 546 records in the imbalanced data category. So we need the Smote algorithm to make the data balanced so as not to result in misclassification. The classification results were tested using the Confusion Matrix, ROC and Geometric Mean (G-Mean) as well as a T-Test. The comparison results show that the best performance is on the K-Nearest Neighbor algorithm with an accuracy value of 84.99%, AUC of 0.700, G-Mean 62.95% and the T-test produces a significant different from other algorithms.
基于SMOTE采样的不平衡数据新生录取分类算法比较
获得优质学生的努力之一是通过选拔。选拔过程必须有一个平衡的策略,这样被选中的学生才真正合格。分类技术可以用来查看新入学学生的历史,这些学生的讲座历史被录取。有许多分类算法可以使用,因此需要进行比较,以查看算法的最佳性能。使用的分类算法是决策树C4.5, k近邻,Naïve贝叶斯和神经网络。使用的数据为不平衡数据类别中的546条记录。所以我们需要Smote算法来平衡数据,以免造成误分类。分类结果采用混淆矩阵、ROC和几何平均(G-Mean)以及t检验进行检验。对比结果表明,k -最近邻算法性能最好,准确率为84.99%,AUC为0.700,G-Mean为62.95%,t检验与其他算法有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信