Reincorporations: A Comparison Between Greek and Cyprus Law

Thomas Papadopoulos
{"title":"Reincorporations: A Comparison Between Greek and Cyprus Law","authors":"Thomas Papadopoulos","doi":"10.1108/IJLMA-04-2017-0098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to analyse the legal framework of reincorporations and subsequent change of applicable law in Greece and Cyprus. A comparison between Greek Law and Cyprus Law is drawn. This paper highlights possible required reforms. Cyprus has a quite detailed legal framework of voluntary inbound and outbound reincorporations. While Greece has certain provisions on outbound reincorporations, it does not have any provisions on inbound reincorporations. The compatibility of these national provisions with internal market rules, as interpreted by the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU), is discussed.,This paper follows a comparative approach. After a careful analysis of each national legal framework, a comparison between Greek law and Cyprus law follows. This paper also follows an EU law approach.,These two jurisdictions present some differences. Cyprus adopting the incorporation theory has a detailed, sophisticated and flexible legal framework of reincorporations. Although Greece adopting the real seat theory has some special provisions for outbound reincorporations, there are no specific provisions for inbound reincorporations. Inbound reincorporations are possible under Greek law, but the absence of detailed provisions is against legal certainty. Cyprus law on reincorporations could be used as an example for Greek legislature. However, possible EU harmonisation of seat transfers is expected to have an immense impact on national provisions for reincorporations.,Reincorporations constitute a significant corporate restructuring technique with important practical implications on the economy. Apart from academics, this paper attracts the interest of lawyers, managers, accountants, officers of supervisory and regulatory bodies and policymakers engaged with reincorporations.,This is one of the few academic papers comparing Greek and Cyprus company law and private international law. It is the first paper that compares the Greek and Cyprus legal framework of reincorporations.","PeriodicalId":313622,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-04-2017-0098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to analyse the legal framework of reincorporations and subsequent change of applicable law in Greece and Cyprus. A comparison between Greek Law and Cyprus Law is drawn. This paper highlights possible required reforms. Cyprus has a quite detailed legal framework of voluntary inbound and outbound reincorporations. While Greece has certain provisions on outbound reincorporations, it does not have any provisions on inbound reincorporations. The compatibility of these national provisions with internal market rules, as interpreted by the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU), is discussed.,This paper follows a comparative approach. After a careful analysis of each national legal framework, a comparison between Greek law and Cyprus law follows. This paper also follows an EU law approach.,These two jurisdictions present some differences. Cyprus adopting the incorporation theory has a detailed, sophisticated and flexible legal framework of reincorporations. Although Greece adopting the real seat theory has some special provisions for outbound reincorporations, there are no specific provisions for inbound reincorporations. Inbound reincorporations are possible under Greek law, but the absence of detailed provisions is against legal certainty. Cyprus law on reincorporations could be used as an example for Greek legislature. However, possible EU harmonisation of seat transfers is expected to have an immense impact on national provisions for reincorporations.,Reincorporations constitute a significant corporate restructuring technique with important practical implications on the economy. Apart from academics, this paper attracts the interest of lawyers, managers, accountants, officers of supervisory and regulatory bodies and policymakers engaged with reincorporations.,This is one of the few academic papers comparing Greek and Cyprus company law and private international law. It is the first paper that compares the Greek and Cyprus legal framework of reincorporations.
公司重组:希腊和塞浦路斯法律比较
本文旨在分析重组的法律框架和随后的变化适用法律在希腊和塞浦路斯。对希腊法和塞浦路斯法进行了比较。本文强调了可能需要的改革。塞浦路斯有相当详细的自愿入境和出境重组的法律框架。虽然希腊对境外公司重组有一定的规定,但对境内公司重组没有任何规定。讨论了这些国家规定与欧盟法院判例法解释的内部市场规则的兼容性。本文采用比较研究的方法。在仔细分析了每个国家的法律框架之后,对希腊法律和塞浦路斯法律进行比较。本文也遵循了欧盟法律的方法。这两个司法管辖区存在一些差异。塞浦路斯采用公司合并理论,拥有详细、成熟和灵活的公司合并法律框架。采用实席理论的希腊虽然对境外公司重组有一些特殊规定,但对境内公司重组没有具体规定。根据希腊法律,境内重组是可能的,但缺乏详细规定不利于法律确定性。塞浦路斯关于重组公司的法律可以作为希腊立法机构的一个例子。然而,欧盟可能对席位转移进行协调,预计将对各国重新注册公司的规定产生巨大影响。重组是一种重要的企业重组技术,对经济具有重要的现实意义。除学术界外,本文还吸引了律师、经理、会计师、监管机构官员和参与公司重组的政策制定者的兴趣。这是为数不多的比较希腊和塞浦路斯公司法和国际私法的学术论文之一。这是第一篇比较希腊和塞浦路斯重组法律框架的论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信