當代新儒家對陸象山學說的比較研究

中正漢學研究 Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.53106/2306036020201200360006

游騰達游騰達

{"title":"當代新儒家對陸象山學說的比較研究","authors":"游騰達游騰達","doi":"10.53106/2306036020201200360006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 本文藉由當代新儒家們對「陸九淵」學說的研究分析，展示徐復觀、唐君毅，牟宗三這三位代表人物不同的研究方法與儒學觀點。\n徐先生著重將研究對象回歸歷史情境進行考察，試圖掘發其思想的邏輯結構，呈現由義利之辨的思想闡析落實至客觀面的政治思想之研究。\n唐先生以哲學發展史的脈絡探討象山的學說，並結合個人生命體驗的觀點，認為發明本心當包含自信本心與剝落障蔽之正、反兩面的整體性工夫。\n牟先生則著眼於象山「非分解」的言說特點，更採取比較哲學的研析觀點，指出其學說不僅是道德的自律型態，又具有超越的無限心之義涵。\n綜上所述，得具體地看到徐、唐、牟三人雖同以陸王心學為依歸，但他們的研究方法有別，對儒學的根源性理解殊異，是以對象山的研究呈現豐富的多樣面貌。掌握這些觀點與方法，當可作為傳統儒學之當代新詮的重要借鏡。\n This essay discusses Lu Xiang-shan’s doctrines researched by 3 representatives of contemporary Neo-Confucianism, Hsu Fu-kuan, Tang Chun-I and Mo Tsung-san.Although the 3 research are all based on Lu-Wang’s theory of mind, they understand Lu Xiang-shan’ s thinking in different ways.The main reason is that their methods and angles are different, which are history of thought, history of philosophy and comparative philosophy.In addition, their interpretations of Confucianism are also different.Once we understand this, we can study this issue further. \n \n","PeriodicalId":243831,"journal":{"name":"中正漢學研究","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中正漢學研究","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/2306036020201200360006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

本文藉由當代新儒家們對「陸九淵」學說的研究分析，展示徐復觀、唐君毅，牟宗三這三位代表人物不同的研究方法與儒學觀點。徐先生著重將研究對象回歸歷史情境進行考察，試圖掘發其思想的邏輯結構，呈現由義利之辨的思想闡析落實至客觀面的政治思想之研究。唐先生以哲學發展史的脈絡探討象山的學說，並結合個人生命體驗的觀點，認為發明本心當包含自信本心與剝落障蔽之正、反兩面的整體性工夫。牟先生則著眼於象山「非分解」的言說特點，更採取比較哲學的研析觀點，指出其學說不僅是道德的自律型態，又具有超越的無限心之義涵。綜上所述，得具體地看到徐、唐、牟三人雖同以陸王心學為依歸，但他們的研究方法有別，對儒學的根源性理解殊異，是以對象山的研究呈現豐富的多樣面貌。掌握這些觀點與方法，當可作為傳統儒學之當代新詮的重要借鏡。 This essay discusses Lu Xiang-shan’s doctrines researched by 3 representatives of contemporary Neo-Confucianism, Hsu Fu-kuan, Tang Chun-I and Mo Tsung-san.Although the 3 research are all based on Lu-Wang’s theory of mind, they understand Lu Xiang-shan’ s thinking in different ways.The main reason is that their methods and angles are different, which are history of thought, history of philosophy and comparative philosophy.In addition, their interpretations of Confucianism are also different.Once we understand this, we can study this issue further.

查看原文本刊更多论文

当代新儒家对陆象山学说的比较研究

本文借由当代新儒家们对「陆九渊」学说的研究分析，展示徐复观、唐君毅，牟宗三这三位代表人物不同的研究方法与儒学观点。徐先生著重将研究对象回归历史情境进行考察，试图掘发其思想的逻辑结构，呈现由义利之辨的思想阐析落实至客观面的政治思想之研究。唐先生以哲学发展史的脉络探讨象山的学说，并结合个人生命体验的观点，认为发明本心当包含自信本心与剥落障蔽之正、反两面的整体性工夫。牟先生则著眼于象山「非分解」的言说特点，更采取比较哲学的研析观点，指出其学说不仅是道德的自律型态，又具有超越的无限心之义涵。综上所述，得具体地看到徐、唐、牟三人虽同以陆王心学为依归，但他们的研究方法有别，对儒学的根源性理解殊异，是以对象山的研究呈现丰富的多样面貌。掌握这些观点与方法，当可作为传统儒学之当代新诠的重要借镜。 This essay discusses Lu Xiang-shan’s doctrines researched by 3 representatives of contemporary Neo-Confucianism, Hsu Fu-kuan, Tang Chun-I and Mo Tsung-san.Although the 3 research are all based on Lu-Wang’s theory of mind, they understand Lu Xiang-shan’ s thinking in different ways.The main reason is that their methods and angles are different, which are history of thought, history of philosophy and comparative philosophy.In addition, their interpretations of Confucianism are also different.Once we understand this, we can study this issue further.

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

中正漢學研究

自引率

0.00%

发文量