Impact of Zero Tolerance Policies on K-12 Education

R. Neal McIntyre Jr.
{"title":"Impact of Zero Tolerance Policies on K-12 Education","authors":"R. Neal McIntyre Jr.","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-5360-2.ch019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the mid-1990s, zero tolerance policies have been utilized in K-12 education as a means of addressing and deterring acts of violence on school grounds. While originally designed to address serious infractions, such as possession of weapons and drugs in schools, these policies have been expanded to include less serious offenses, such as fighting, absences, and other minor disturbances. Critics argue that this punitive approach has not only led to the inconsistent use and application of these policies but has also been used as a means of forcing lower performing students and minorities out of school by criminalizing minor acts thereby creating a school-to-prison pipeline. Research has identified that these policies are ineffective and has had a detrimental impact on kids both in school and beyond, yet they are still popular. This chapter examines these various issues and harmful consequences of zero tolerance while offering recommendations for schools to implement restorative justice practices, or a similar philosophy, in their response to wrongdoings by students.","PeriodicalId":345126,"journal":{"name":"Research Anthology on School Shootings, Peer Victimization, and Solutions for Building Safer Educational Institutions","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Anthology on School Shootings, Peer Victimization, and Solutions for Building Safer Educational Institutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-5360-2.ch019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the mid-1990s, zero tolerance policies have been utilized in K-12 education as a means of addressing and deterring acts of violence on school grounds. While originally designed to address serious infractions, such as possession of weapons and drugs in schools, these policies have been expanded to include less serious offenses, such as fighting, absences, and other minor disturbances. Critics argue that this punitive approach has not only led to the inconsistent use and application of these policies but has also been used as a means of forcing lower performing students and minorities out of school by criminalizing minor acts thereby creating a school-to-prison pipeline. Research has identified that these policies are ineffective and has had a detrimental impact on kids both in school and beyond, yet they are still popular. This chapter examines these various issues and harmful consequences of zero tolerance while offering recommendations for schools to implement restorative justice practices, or a similar philosophy, in their response to wrongdoings by students.
零容忍政策对K-12教育的影响
自20世纪90年代中期以来,零容忍政策已被用于K-12教育,作为解决和阻止校园暴力行为的手段。虽然这些政策最初是为了解决严重的违法行为,如在学校拥有武器和毒品,但这些政策已经扩大到包括不太严重的违法行为,如打架、缺课和其他轻微的骚乱。批评人士认为,这种惩罚性的做法不仅导致这些政策的使用和应用不一致,而且还被用作一种手段,通过将轻微行为定为犯罪,从而形成一条从学校到监狱的管道,迫使表现较差的学生和少数民族辍学。研究表明,这些政策是无效的,对孩子们在校内外都有有害的影响,但它们仍然很受欢迎。本章探讨了这些不同的问题和零容忍的有害后果,同时为学校在应对学生的不法行为时实施恢复性司法实践或类似的哲学提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信