Posterolateral Fusion Surgery with Decompression: An Effective Treatment Option for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Yousif Sharaf
{"title":"Posterolateral Fusion Surgery with Decompression: An Effective Treatment Option for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis","authors":"Yousif Sharaf","doi":"10.58624/svoaor.2023.03.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive description of our experience in treating lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients and the clinical outcomes and postoperative complications of surgical decompression and non - instrumented posterolateral fusion. Methods: It ’ s an observational descriptive cross - sectional study conducted on 124 consecutive patients operated for the first time for lumber spinal stenosis. Results: A total of 124 patients operated for the first time for lumber spinal stenosis during the study period. The mean age was 63.8±11.6 years. Women were slightly predominant compared to men (52.4% vs. 47.6%). The mean Oswestry disability index differed statistically significantly between time points (F (1.93, 237.798) = 6995.59, P < 0.0001) between all the periods (Figure 1). Similarly for Zurich Claudication Questionnaire score over time, the mean also was significantly different between time points (F (2, 246) = 70.828, P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Posterolateral fusion surgery with decompression was found to be an effective treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. This approach involves fusion without instrumentation, which reduces both operating time and intraoperative complications. It also leads to faster post - operative mobilization and less pain. Therefore, it is suggested that posterolateral noninstrumented fusion surgery with decompression be considered as a primary treatment option for lumbar spinal stenosis.","PeriodicalId":228293,"journal":{"name":"SVOA Orthopaedics","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SVOA Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58624/svoaor.2023.03.036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive description of our experience in treating lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients and the clinical outcomes and postoperative complications of surgical decompression and non - instrumented posterolateral fusion. Methods: It ’ s an observational descriptive cross - sectional study conducted on 124 consecutive patients operated for the first time for lumber spinal stenosis. Results: A total of 124 patients operated for the first time for lumber spinal stenosis during the study period. The mean age was 63.8±11.6 years. Women were slightly predominant compared to men (52.4% vs. 47.6%). The mean Oswestry disability index differed statistically significantly between time points (F (1.93, 237.798) = 6995.59, P < 0.0001) between all the periods (Figure 1). Similarly for Zurich Claudication Questionnaire score over time, the mean also was significantly different between time points (F (2, 246) = 70.828, P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Posterolateral fusion surgery with decompression was found to be an effective treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. This approach involves fusion without instrumentation, which reduces both operating time and intraoperative complications. It also leads to faster post - operative mobilization and less pain. Therefore, it is suggested that posterolateral noninstrumented fusion surgery with decompression be considered as a primary treatment option for lumbar spinal stenosis.
后外侧融合减压手术:腰椎管狭窄症的有效治疗选择
目的:本研究的目的是全面描述我们治疗腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者的经验,以及手术减压和无固定后外侧融合的临床结果和术后并发症。方法:对连续124例首次行腰椎管狭窄手术的患者进行观察性描述性横断面研究。结果:研究期间共有124例腰椎管狭窄患者首次行手术治疗。平均年龄63.8±11.6岁。女性比男性略占优势(52.4%比47.6%)。各时间段的Oswestry残疾指数均值差异有统计学意义(F (1.93, 237.798) = 6995.59, P < 0.0001)(图1)。苏黎世跛行问卷评分随时间的均值差异也有统计学意义(F (2,246) = 70.828, P < 0.0001)。结论:后外侧融合减压手术是治疗腰椎管狭窄症的有效方法。该入路包括无内固定的融合,减少了手术时间和术中并发症。它也导致更快的术后活动和更少的疼痛。因此,建议将后外侧无固定融合减压手术作为腰椎管狭窄的主要治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信