S. F. Khatib, D. F. Abdullah, Ahmed A. Elamer, Ahmed A. Elamer, Raed Abueid
{"title":"Nudging Toward Diversity in the Boardroom: A Systematic Literature Review of Board Diversity of Financial Institutions","authors":"S. F. Khatib, D. F. Abdullah, Ahmed A. Elamer, Ahmed A. Elamer, Raed Abueid","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3706162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Going beyond the mere gender diversity in the boardroom, this systematic review comprehensively covers the research on board diversity of financial institutions. More specifically, we cover gender diversity, as well as other characteristics of diversity, such as nationality, age, tenure, experience, education, ethnicity, and religion. A systematic literature review was employed using Scopus and Web of Science databases, covering all publications until May 2020, which resulted in 91 studies from 66 top-ranked journals in accounting, finance and economic fields. We analyze them based on the journal, methodology, research construct questions, and theoretical perspectives. Our results highlight the substantial knowledge gaps and the inconsistent findings of prior studies on several aspects of the field, suggesting avenues for further studies in terms of research designs, settings, scope, and theories. We argue that there is a need to explore other board diversity attributes rather than focusing on the gender diversity of the boards of financial institutions to achieve sustainable development. Also, more work is outlined on topics related to board diversity of financial firms that receive limited attention from scholars, such as (but not limited to) environmental performance, capital structure, intellectual capital, innovation and earnings quality of financial institutions as well as the indirect effect of policy settings.","PeriodicalId":256682,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Board Decision-Making (Topic)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"129","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Board Decision-Making (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3706162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 129
Abstract
Going beyond the mere gender diversity in the boardroom, this systematic review comprehensively covers the research on board diversity of financial institutions. More specifically, we cover gender diversity, as well as other characteristics of diversity, such as nationality, age, tenure, experience, education, ethnicity, and religion. A systematic literature review was employed using Scopus and Web of Science databases, covering all publications until May 2020, which resulted in 91 studies from 66 top-ranked journals in accounting, finance and economic fields. We analyze them based on the journal, methodology, research construct questions, and theoretical perspectives. Our results highlight the substantial knowledge gaps and the inconsistent findings of prior studies on several aspects of the field, suggesting avenues for further studies in terms of research designs, settings, scope, and theories. We argue that there is a need to explore other board diversity attributes rather than focusing on the gender diversity of the boards of financial institutions to achieve sustainable development. Also, more work is outlined on topics related to board diversity of financial firms that receive limited attention from scholars, such as (but not limited to) environmental performance, capital structure, intellectual capital, innovation and earnings quality of financial institutions as well as the indirect effect of policy settings.
这篇系统性综述超越了董事会的性别多样性,全面涵盖了对金融机构董事会多样性的研究。更具体地说,我们涵盖了性别多样性,以及其他多样性的特征,如国籍、年龄、任期、经验、教育、种族和宗教。使用Scopus和Web of Science数据库进行系统文献综述,涵盖截至2020年5月的所有出版物,共纳入会计、金融和经济领域66种顶级期刊的91项研究。本文从期刊、研究方法、研究结构问题和理论视角等方面进行分析。我们的研究结果突出了该领域若干方面的大量知识缺口和先前研究的不一致发现,为研究设计、设置、范围和理论方面的进一步研究提供了途径。我们认为,为了实现可持续发展,有必要探索其他董事会多样性属性,而不是关注金融机构董事会的性别多样性。此外,本文还概述了与学者关注有限的金融公司董事会多样性相关的主题,如(但不限于)金融机构的环境绩效、资本结构、智力资本、创新和盈余质量以及政策设置的间接影响。