Data Science and the Decline of Liberal Law and Ethics

Sebastian Benthall, Jake Goldenfein
{"title":"Data Science and the Decline of Liberal Law and Ethics","authors":"Sebastian Benthall, Jake Goldenfein","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3632577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The law and ethics of Western democratic states have their basis in liberalism, and this extends to legal regulation and ethical discussion of technology and businesses doing data processing. We argue that these forms of regulation and ethical analysis are largely incompatible with the techno-political and techno-economic dimensions of data science. Over the course of the 20th century, computer science, cognitive psychology, operations research, statistics and other fields, have converged on an understanding of utility-maximizing agency that, combined with a neo-liberal legal configuration, guarantees the supremacy of private corporations over individuals that would know and defend their own individual interests. In particular, platforms have inverted the relationship between individuals and the market, making the former public and the latter private. It is this crisis of liberalism, and the degraded status of the individual in their relationship to data science platforms, that is at the heart of data science ethics. Therefore, data science ethics cannot be addressed from within liberalism; it requires new theory that builds on data science itself.","PeriodicalId":404477,"journal":{"name":"Mechanical Engineering eJournal","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanical Engineering eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3632577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The law and ethics of Western democratic states have their basis in liberalism, and this extends to legal regulation and ethical discussion of technology and businesses doing data processing. We argue that these forms of regulation and ethical analysis are largely incompatible with the techno-political and techno-economic dimensions of data science. Over the course of the 20th century, computer science, cognitive psychology, operations research, statistics and other fields, have converged on an understanding of utility-maximizing agency that, combined with a neo-liberal legal configuration, guarantees the supremacy of private corporations over individuals that would know and defend their own individual interests. In particular, platforms have inverted the relationship between individuals and the market, making the former public and the latter private. It is this crisis of liberalism, and the degraded status of the individual in their relationship to data science platforms, that is at the heart of data science ethics. Therefore, data science ethics cannot be addressed from within liberalism; it requires new theory that builds on data science itself.
数据科学与自由主义法律和伦理的衰落
西方民主国家的法律和道德以自由主义为基础,这延伸到对技术和数据处理业务的法律监管和道德讨论。我们认为,这些形式的监管和伦理分析在很大程度上与数据科学的技术-政治和技术-经济维度不相容。在20世纪的过程中,计算机科学、认知心理学、运筹学、统计学和其他领域已经汇聚在对效用最大化机构的理解上,这种理解与新自由主义的法律配置相结合,保证了私营公司对个人的至高无上地位,而个人则知道并捍卫自己的个人利益。特别是,平台倒转了个人与市场的关系,使前者成为公众,后者成为私人。正是这种自由主义的危机,以及个人在与数据科学平台的关系中地位的下降,才是数据科学伦理的核心。因此,数据科学伦理不能从自由主义内部解决;它需要建立在数据科学本身基础上的新理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信