{"title":"The Siege of Harlem and Its Commune","authors":"Myka Tucker-Abramson","doi":"10.5422/fordham/9780823282708.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Warren Miller’s Siege of Harlem is a strange and vexing novel that draws on the “internal colony” thesis of black power thinkers and imagines Harlem’s secession from the United States. It is also a novel that marks the end of the era of urban renewal and the passing from the era of Robert Moses to that of Jane Jacobs. This concluding chapter suggests that Siege can help us refuse the forced choices between Moses and Jacobs, or the planners and the walkers, that dominate conversations about post-war planning. Siege does so, the conclusion argues, by offering a different trajectory of urban thinking and politics, one that stretches from the multicultural and often Communist-led left in the 1930s and 1940s, to the working class, Puerto Rican, and black urban revolts of the 1960s, which put forward a militantly socialist, internationalist, and anti-imperialist urban vision. It is this form of urbanism, the conclusion suggests, that we need to return to today.","PeriodicalId":202297,"journal":{"name":"Novel Shocks","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novel Shocks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823282708.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Warren Miller’s Siege of Harlem is a strange and vexing novel that draws on the “internal colony” thesis of black power thinkers and imagines Harlem’s secession from the United States. It is also a novel that marks the end of the era of urban renewal and the passing from the era of Robert Moses to that of Jane Jacobs. This concluding chapter suggests that Siege can help us refuse the forced choices between Moses and Jacobs, or the planners and the walkers, that dominate conversations about post-war planning. Siege does so, the conclusion argues, by offering a different trajectory of urban thinking and politics, one that stretches from the multicultural and often Communist-led left in the 1930s and 1940s, to the working class, Puerto Rican, and black urban revolts of the 1960s, which put forward a militantly socialist, internationalist, and anti-imperialist urban vision. It is this form of urbanism, the conclusion suggests, that we need to return to today.
沃伦·米勒(Warren Miller)的《围攻哈莱姆》(Siege of Harlem)是一部奇怪而令人烦恼的小说,它借鉴了黑人权力思想家的“内部殖民地”理论,并想象了哈莱姆区与美国的分离。这也是一部标志着城市更新时代的结束和从罗伯特·摩西时代过渡到简·雅各布斯时代的小说。这一结束语表明,《围城》可以帮助我们拒绝在摩西和雅各布斯之间,或规划者和步行者之间的被迫选择,这些选择主导着战后规划的讨论。结论认为,《围城》通过提供不同的城市思想和政治轨迹做到了这一点,从20世纪30年代和40年代的多元文化和共产主义领导的左翼,延伸到20世纪60年代的工人阶级、波多黎各人和黑人城市起义,他们提出了一个激进的社会主义、国际主义和反帝国主义的城市愿景。结论表明,我们今天需要回归的正是这种形式的城市主义。