An overview of categories of vulnerability among on-demand workers in the gig economy (Part 2)

D. M. Smit, Grey Stopforth
{"title":"An overview of categories of vulnerability among on-demand workers in the gig economy (Part 2)","authors":"D. M. Smit, Grey Stopforth","doi":"10.17159/2077-4907/2023/ldd.v27.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Platform work in the gig economy has become a universal phenomenon, even more so in the socially distanced landscape of COVID-19. Characteristic of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, hundreds of thousands of on-demand workers across the globe today earn a living by performing tasks assigned to them via digital platforms. The gig economy undoubtedly offers certain appealing benefits, including work flexibility and independence. As established in part 1 of this article, platform work holds vast potential to create much-needed jobs, especially for the youth, who are facing a higher degree of job precarity than any generation before them. At the same time, though, the very structure of platform work - with a peculiar triangular contracting relationship between the parties involved -renders on-demand workers vulnerable, having to carry most of the risk. In part 2, we delve deeper into the various forms of vulnerability among on-demand workers in the gig economy, with a particular focus on developing countries such as South Africa. After a brief look at the extent to which the classification of labour could be regarded as a contributing factor to vulnerability, we draw on the International Labour Organisation (ILO) definition of vulnerability to categorise the types of vulnerability on-demand gig workers are exposed to. Four broad categories are identified, namely vulnerability relating to conditions of employment, individual and collective labour rights, dispute resolution structures, and social security protection. Each category is concretised by a brief discussion of the applicable South African statutory provisions as well as practical examples. This is followed by an overview of various international standards and recent steps taken by the ILO and the European Union to protect platform workers in the gig economy. The article concludes with proposals on how to expand the traditional idea and categories of work in an effort to afford rights and protection - and so provide decent work - to new, future-oriented types of workers in South Africa. It is argued that South Africa needs to develop a uniquely South African approach to the future of work that has on-demand workers and their vulnerabilities at its centre.","PeriodicalId":341103,"journal":{"name":"Law, Democracy and Development","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law, Democracy and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2077-4907/2023/ldd.v27.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Platform work in the gig economy has become a universal phenomenon, even more so in the socially distanced landscape of COVID-19. Characteristic of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, hundreds of thousands of on-demand workers across the globe today earn a living by performing tasks assigned to them via digital platforms. The gig economy undoubtedly offers certain appealing benefits, including work flexibility and independence. As established in part 1 of this article, platform work holds vast potential to create much-needed jobs, especially for the youth, who are facing a higher degree of job precarity than any generation before them. At the same time, though, the very structure of platform work - with a peculiar triangular contracting relationship between the parties involved -renders on-demand workers vulnerable, having to carry most of the risk. In part 2, we delve deeper into the various forms of vulnerability among on-demand workers in the gig economy, with a particular focus on developing countries such as South Africa. After a brief look at the extent to which the classification of labour could be regarded as a contributing factor to vulnerability, we draw on the International Labour Organisation (ILO) definition of vulnerability to categorise the types of vulnerability on-demand gig workers are exposed to. Four broad categories are identified, namely vulnerability relating to conditions of employment, individual and collective labour rights, dispute resolution structures, and social security protection. Each category is concretised by a brief discussion of the applicable South African statutory provisions as well as practical examples. This is followed by an overview of various international standards and recent steps taken by the ILO and the European Union to protect platform workers in the gig economy. The article concludes with proposals on how to expand the traditional idea and categories of work in an effort to afford rights and protection - and so provide decent work - to new, future-oriented types of workers in South Africa. It is argued that South Africa needs to develop a uniquely South African approach to the future of work that has on-demand workers and their vulnerabilities at its centre.
零工经济中按需工作者的脆弱性类别概述(第2部分)
零工经济中的平台工作已成为一种普遍现象,在COVID-19社会隔离的情况下更是如此。作为第四次工业革命的特征,全球成千上万的按需工作者通过数字平台执行分配给他们的任务来谋生。零工经济无疑提供了一些吸引人的好处,包括工作的灵活性和独立性。正如本文第1部分所述,平台工作具有巨大的潜力,可以创造急需的就业机会,特别是对年轻人来说,他们比以往任何一代人都面临着更高程度的工作不稳定性。然而,与此同时,平台工作的结构本身——与相关各方之间特殊的三角合同关系——使得按需工作者变得脆弱,不得不承担大部分风险。在第二部分中,我们深入研究了零工经济中按需工作者的各种形式的脆弱性,并特别关注南非等发展中国家。在简要介绍了劳动分类在多大程度上可以被视为脆弱性的促成因素之后,我们借鉴了国际劳工组织(ILO)对脆弱性的定义,对按需零工工人所面临的脆弱性类型进行了分类。确定了四大类,即与就业条件有关的脆弱性、个人和集体劳工权利、解决争端结构和社会安全保护。每一类都通过对适用的南非法律规定和实际例子的简要讨论加以具体化。随后概述了各种国际标准以及国际劳工组织和欧盟最近为保护零工经济中的平台工人所采取的措施。文章最后提出了关于如何扩大传统观念和工作类别的建议,以便努力向南非面向未来的新型工人提供权利和保护- -从而提供体面的工作。有人认为,南非需要制定一种独特的南非方法来应对未来的工作,以按需工人和他们的脆弱性为中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信