Case Note: Blind SA v Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition and Others [2002] ZACC 33

Bongiwe Zungu
{"title":"Case Note: Blind SA v Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition and Others [2002] ZACC 33","authors":"Bongiwe Zungu","doi":"10.47348/saipl/v10/a6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Materials under copyright, such as books and other literary works, are essential for human development and well-being. Accessing the information contained in these materials is relatively straightforward for sighted individuals, but for persons with print and visual disabilities, access is a challenge and often costly. The barrier to accessing information threatens various constitutional rights of persons with print and visual disabilities. The threatened rights include the right of access to information, the right to education, the right to equality and the right to human dignity. South Africa has been undergoing a process of copyright reform for over 15 years to remedy the violation of these rights. However, pending the finalisation of this process, the threat to these rights persists, and the matter thus warranted the intervention of the apex court in Blind SA v Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition and Others [2002] ZACC 33. This note first considers the regulation of copyright in South Africa to provide context. The note then analyses the Constitutional Court’s decision and considers the decision of the court a quo to provide some background on the matter. The note ends with an analysis of the implications of the judgment for persons with print and visual disabilities and a discussion of issues that the court did not consider.","PeriodicalId":357543,"journal":{"name":"South African Intellectual Property Law Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Intellectual Property Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47348/saipl/v10/a6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Materials under copyright, such as books and other literary works, are essential for human development and well-being. Accessing the information contained in these materials is relatively straightforward for sighted individuals, but for persons with print and visual disabilities, access is a challenge and often costly. The barrier to accessing information threatens various constitutional rights of persons with print and visual disabilities. The threatened rights include the right of access to information, the right to education, the right to equality and the right to human dignity. South Africa has been undergoing a process of copyright reform for over 15 years to remedy the violation of these rights. However, pending the finalisation of this process, the threat to these rights persists, and the matter thus warranted the intervention of the apex court in Blind SA v Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition and Others [2002] ZACC 33. This note first considers the regulation of copyright in South Africa to provide context. The note then analyses the Constitutional Court’s decision and considers the decision of the court a quo to provide some background on the matter. The note ends with an analysis of the implications of the judgment for persons with print and visual disabilities and a discussion of issues that the court did not consider.
案例说明:盲人SA诉贸易、工业和竞争部长和其他人[2002]ZACC 33
受版权保护的材料,如书籍和其他文学作品,对人类发展和福祉至关重要。对于视力正常的人来说,获取这些材料中包含的信息相对简单,但对于有印刷品和视力障碍的人来说,获取这些材料是一项挑战,而且往往代价高昂。获取信息的障碍威胁到印刷品和视觉障碍者的各种宪法权利。受到威胁的权利包括获得信息的权利、受教育的权利、平等的权利和人的尊严的权利。南非15年来一直在进行版权改革,以纠正对这些权利的侵犯。然而,在这一进程最终完成之前,对这些权利的威胁仍然存在,因此,在Blind SA诉贸易、工业和竞争部长及其他人[2002]ZACC 33案中,最高法院有理由介入此事。本说明首先考虑南非的版权管理,以提供背景。然后,本说明分析了宪法法院的裁决,并认为法院的裁决是现状,以提供有关该问题的一些背景。本说明最后分析了判决对印刷品和视力障碍者的影响,并讨论了法院未考虑的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信