The Axiomatic Derivation of Absolute Lower Bounds

Y. Moschovakis
{"title":"The Axiomatic Derivation of Absolute Lower Bounds","authors":"Y. Moschovakis","doi":"10.1109/LICS.2008.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ancient Euclidean algorithm computes the greatest common divisor gcd(m, n) of two natural numbers from (or relative to) the remainder operation rem, which is assumed as primitive; it requires no more than 2 log(min(m, n)) applications of the remainder operation to compute gcd(m, n) (for m, n ges 2), and it is not known to be optimal: Conjecture: for every algorithm a which computes on Nopf from rem the greatest common divisor function, there is a constant r > 0 such that for infinitely many pairs a ges b ges 1, calpha(a, b) ges rlog2(a), where calpha(m,n) counts the number of calls to \"the remainder oracle\" required by a for the computation of gcd(m, n). The conjecture claims a logarithmic lower bound for all algorithms which compute gcd(m, n) from the remainder operation, not just those expressed by a specific class of computation models. In this lecture the author develops an approach to the theory of algorithms in the style of abstract model theory which makes it possible to make precise and (on occasion) prove the existence of non-trivial, absolute lower bounds for a wide variety of problems and specified primitives, including many of the results in the bibliography.","PeriodicalId":298300,"journal":{"name":"2008 23rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 23rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2008.52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The ancient Euclidean algorithm computes the greatest common divisor gcd(m, n) of two natural numbers from (or relative to) the remainder operation rem, which is assumed as primitive; it requires no more than 2 log(min(m, n)) applications of the remainder operation to compute gcd(m, n) (for m, n ges 2), and it is not known to be optimal: Conjecture: for every algorithm a which computes on Nopf from rem the greatest common divisor function, there is a constant r > 0 such that for infinitely many pairs a ges b ges 1, calpha(a, b) ges rlog2(a), where calpha(m,n) counts the number of calls to "the remainder oracle" required by a for the computation of gcd(m, n). The conjecture claims a logarithmic lower bound for all algorithms which compute gcd(m, n) from the remainder operation, not just those expressed by a specific class of computation models. In this lecture the author develops an approach to the theory of algorithms in the style of abstract model theory which makes it possible to make precise and (on occasion) prove the existence of non-trivial, absolute lower bounds for a wide variety of problems and specified primitives, including many of the results in the bibliography.
绝对下界的公理化推导
古老的欧几里得算法从(或相对于)余数运算rem计算两个自然数的最大公约数gcd(m, n),假设它是原始的;计算gcd(m, n)(对于m, n ges 2)需要不超过2 log(min(m, n))次的余数运算,并且不知道它是否最优。对于每一个从最大公约数函数rem计算Nopf的算法a,存在一个常数r > 0,使得对于无限多对a ges b ges 1, calpha(a, b) ges rlog2(a),其中calpha(m,n)计算计算gcd(m, n)所需的“余数oracle”的调用次数。该猜想为所有从余数运算计算gcd(m, n)的算法提供了一个对数下界。而不仅仅是由一类特定的计算模型所表达的。在这个讲座中,作者以抽象模型理论的风格发展了一种算法理论的方法,这种方法可以精确地(有时)证明各种各样的问题和特定原语的非平凡绝对下界的存在,包括参考书目中的许多结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信