Thinking Climate – A Mind Genomics Cartography

Avi Yaschin, Ariola Harizi, S. Davidov, Pnina Deitel
{"title":"Thinking Climate – A Mind Genomics Cartography","authors":"Avi Yaschin, Ariola Harizi, S. Davidov, Pnina Deitel","doi":"10.31038/escc.2020213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with the inner mind of the respondent about climate change, using Mind Genomics. Respondents evaluated different combinations of messages about problems and solutions touching on current and future climate change. Respondents rated each combination on a two-dimensional scale regarding believability and workability. The ratings were deconstructed into the linkage between each message and believability vs. workability, respectively. Two mind-sets emerged, Alarmists who focus on the problems that are obvious to climate change, and Investors who focus on a limited number of feasible solutions. These two mind-sets distribute across the population, but can be uncovered through a PVI, personal mind-set identifier. Introduction Importance of the Weather and Climate As of this writing, the concerns about climate i daily in written materials, whether the news or in academic articles. A search during mid-December 2020 reveal 416 million hits for ‘global warming,’ 350 million hits for ‘global cooling’ 886 million his for ‘weather storms’ and 608 million hits for ‘global weather change.’ The academic literature shows the parallel level of interest in weather and its changes. A retrospective of issues about climate change shows the increasing number of ‘hit’ over the past 20 years, as Table 1 shows. These hits suggest that issues regarding climate change are high on the list of people’s concerns. Beyond Surveys to the Inside of the Mind The typical news story about climate changes is predicated on storytelling, combining a historical overview, current economic concerns, description of behavior from a social psychology or sociological viewpoint, and often a doom and gloom prediction which demands action today to be forestalled. All aspects are correct, in theory. What is missing is a deeper understanding of the inner thinking of a person when confronting the issue of climate change. Year Global Warming Global Cooling Weather Storms Global Weather Change 2000 14,900 22,300 8,370 34,30","PeriodicalId":277199,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31038/escc.2020213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper deals with the inner mind of the respondent about climate change, using Mind Genomics. Respondents evaluated different combinations of messages about problems and solutions touching on current and future climate change. Respondents rated each combination on a two-dimensional scale regarding believability and workability. The ratings were deconstructed into the linkage between each message and believability vs. workability, respectively. Two mind-sets emerged, Alarmists who focus on the problems that are obvious to climate change, and Investors who focus on a limited number of feasible solutions. These two mind-sets distribute across the population, but can be uncovered through a PVI, personal mind-set identifier. Introduction Importance of the Weather and Climate As of this writing, the concerns about climate i daily in written materials, whether the news or in academic articles. A search during mid-December 2020 reveal 416 million hits for ‘global warming,’ 350 million hits for ‘global cooling’ 886 million his for ‘weather storms’ and 608 million hits for ‘global weather change.’ The academic literature shows the parallel level of interest in weather and its changes. A retrospective of issues about climate change shows the increasing number of ‘hit’ over the past 20 years, as Table 1 shows. These hits suggest that issues regarding climate change are high on the list of people’s concerns. Beyond Surveys to the Inside of the Mind The typical news story about climate changes is predicated on storytelling, combining a historical overview, current economic concerns, description of behavior from a social psychology or sociological viewpoint, and often a doom and gloom prediction which demands action today to be forestalled. All aspects are correct, in theory. What is missing is a deeper understanding of the inner thinking of a person when confronting the issue of climate change. Year Global Warming Global Cooling Weather Storms Global Weather Change 2000 14,900 22,300 8,370 34,30
思考气候-思维基因组学制图
本文利用思维基因组学研究了受访者对气候变化的内心想法。受访者对涉及当前和未来气候变化的问题和解决方案的信息的不同组合进行了评估。受访者根据可信度和可操作性对每种组合进行二维评分。这些评分被分解成每条信息与可信度和可行性之间的联系。出现了两种思维模式,一种是关注气候变化显而易见的问题的危言耸听者,另一种是关注数量有限的可行解决方案的投资者。这两种心态分布在人群中,但可以通过PVI(个人心态标识符)来揭示。天气和气候的重要性在撰写本文时,对气候的关注每天都出现在书面材料中,无论是新闻还是学术文章。2020年12月中旬的搜索结果显示,“全球变暖”有4.16亿次搜索,“全球变冷”有3.5亿次搜索,“天气风暴”有8.86亿次搜索,“全球天气变化”有6.08亿次搜索。“学术文献显示,人们对天气及其变化的兴趣程度与此相当。”如表1所示,对气候变化问题的回顾显示,在过去20年中,“受打击”的次数不断增加。这些点击率表明,有关气候变化的问题在人们关注的名单上名列前茅。关于气候变化的典型新闻故事以讲故事为基础,结合了历史概述、当前经济问题、从社会心理学或社会学角度对行为的描述,以及通常要求今天采取行动的悲观预测。从理论上讲,所有方面都是正确的。缺少的是对一个人在面对气候变化问题时的内心想法的更深层次的理解。全球变暖全球变冷天气风暴全球天气变化2000年14900 22300 8370 34,30
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信