Social networks and brokerage behavior in Indonesian elections: Evidence from Central Java

George Towar Ikbal Tawakkal, Ratnaningsih Damayanti, T. Subekti, Faqih Alfian, A. Garner
{"title":"Social networks and brokerage behavior in Indonesian elections: Evidence from Central Java","authors":"George Towar Ikbal Tawakkal, Ratnaningsih Damayanti, T. Subekti, Faqih Alfian, A. Garner","doi":"10.1080/00927678.2020.1765473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This manuscript examines the role of intermediaries known as “brokers” in mobilizing voters, often by distributing cash and material goods, for campaigns in Indonesia. We build upon previous studies by examining the role of social networks in recruiting brokers into campaigns, the structure of brokerage networks, and the motivations of brokers to join a campaign. Whereas past studies tend to view the candidate-broker relationship in transactional terms, our study finds that the social network of candidates is also an important factor that helps explain how brokerage networks are structured and also the considerations that motivate brokers to work for a campaign. While material benefits and transactional considerations do motivate some brokers, we also find a wide variety of solidary benefits such as personal friendships and shared membership in social organizations as motivating factors for many other brokers. Our findings are based on in-depth interviews with approximately 150 individuals (candidates, brokers, citizens, etc.) during the 2017–2019 series of Indonesian elections which includes local village head elections, legislative elections, and the gubernatorial election.","PeriodicalId":392598,"journal":{"name":"Asian Affairs: An American Review","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Affairs: An American Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2020.1765473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract This manuscript examines the role of intermediaries known as “brokers” in mobilizing voters, often by distributing cash and material goods, for campaigns in Indonesia. We build upon previous studies by examining the role of social networks in recruiting brokers into campaigns, the structure of brokerage networks, and the motivations of brokers to join a campaign. Whereas past studies tend to view the candidate-broker relationship in transactional terms, our study finds that the social network of candidates is also an important factor that helps explain how brokerage networks are structured and also the considerations that motivate brokers to work for a campaign. While material benefits and transactional considerations do motivate some brokers, we also find a wide variety of solidary benefits such as personal friendships and shared membership in social organizations as motivating factors for many other brokers. Our findings are based on in-depth interviews with approximately 150 individuals (candidates, brokers, citizens, etc.) during the 2017–2019 series of Indonesian elections which includes local village head elections, legislative elections, and the gubernatorial election.
印尼选举中的社交网络和经纪行为:来自中爪哇的证据
摘要:本文考察了被称为“经纪人”的中介机构在动员选民中的作用,通常是通过分发现金和物质商品,为印度尼西亚的竞选活动。我们在之前的研究基础上,考察了社交网络在招募经纪人加入竞选活动中的作用、经纪网络的结构以及经纪人加入竞选活动的动机。尽管过去的研究倾向于从交易的角度看待候选人与经纪人的关系,但我们的研究发现,候选人的社会网络也是一个重要因素,有助于解释经纪网络是如何构建的,也是激励经纪人为竞选工作的考虑因素。虽然物质利益和交易考虑确实激励了一些经纪人,但我们也发现各种各样的团结利益,如个人友谊和社会组织的共同会员资格,是许多其他经纪人的激励因素。我们的研究结果基于对2017-2019年印度尼西亚一系列选举(包括当地村长选举、立法机构选举和州长选举)期间约150人(候选人、经纪人、公民等)的深度访谈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信