Docetaxel, Cisplatin, Leucovorin and 5- Fluorouracil versus Leucovorin, 5-Fluorouracil, and Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Chemoradiation in Head and Neck Cancer

Rumana Afroz Majumder, Amanul Islam, Md. Abdul Mannan, A. Chowdhury
{"title":"Docetaxel, Cisplatin, Leucovorin and 5- Fluorouracil versus Leucovorin, 5-Fluorouracil, and Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Chemoradiation in Head and Neck Cancer","authors":"Rumana Afroz Majumder, Amanul Islam, Md. Abdul Mannan, A. Chowdhury","doi":"10.36347/sasjm.2023.v09i08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: HNSCC is the fifth most common cancer in the world and one of the most prevalent cancers in Bangladesh. Despite significant improvement in radiotherapy, the high incidence of loco-regional recurrences is a major challenge for radiation oncologists. This study was done to compare the response and toxicity of Docetaxel, Cisplatin, Leucovorin and 5- Fluorouracil (TPLF) vs Leucovorin, 5- Fluorouracil, and Cisplatin (LFP) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemo-radiation with Cisplatin in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer of squamous cell carcinoma. Materials and Methods: This study was carried out among 60 patients of locally advanced of head and neck cancer at Khwaja Yunus Ali Medical College & Hospital, Sirajganj from January 2015 to December 2015. In Arm-A, 30 patients received three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on D1, Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on D1, Leukovorine 30 mg on D1-D3, 5-Flourouracil 750 mg/m2 on D1-D5 and in Arm B 30 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 on D1, Leucovorine 30 mg on D1-D3, 5-Flourouracil 750mg/m 2 on D1-D5 3 cycles with three weeks interval followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 66 Gy in 33 fractions and weekly Cisplatin 40 mg/m 2 started on the first day of radiation. Results: Most of the patients were male and middle-aged group. In Arm-A, 21 patients (70%) showed complete response whereas in Arm-B regimen complete response was noticed in 16 patients (53.3%) which was statistically significant; however, partial responses were significantly more found in Arm-B. Regarding toxicity, with Arm-A patients experienced slightly more toxicities in comparison to Arm-B which was statistically non-significant. Conclusion: So, it could be concluded from this study that the therapeutic gain was better obtained in Arm-A compared to Arm-B in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.","PeriodicalId":193141,"journal":{"name":"SAS Journal of Medicine","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36347/sasjm.2023.v09i08.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: HNSCC is the fifth most common cancer in the world and one of the most prevalent cancers in Bangladesh. Despite significant improvement in radiotherapy, the high incidence of loco-regional recurrences is a major challenge for radiation oncologists. This study was done to compare the response and toxicity of Docetaxel, Cisplatin, Leucovorin and 5- Fluorouracil (TPLF) vs Leucovorin, 5- Fluorouracil, and Cisplatin (LFP) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemo-radiation with Cisplatin in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer of squamous cell carcinoma. Materials and Methods: This study was carried out among 60 patients of locally advanced of head and neck cancer at Khwaja Yunus Ali Medical College & Hospital, Sirajganj from January 2015 to December 2015. In Arm-A, 30 patients received three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on D1, Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on D1, Leukovorine 30 mg on D1-D3, 5-Flourouracil 750 mg/m2 on D1-D5 and in Arm B 30 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 on D1, Leucovorine 30 mg on D1-D3, 5-Flourouracil 750mg/m 2 on D1-D5 3 cycles with three weeks interval followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 66 Gy in 33 fractions and weekly Cisplatin 40 mg/m 2 started on the first day of radiation. Results: Most of the patients were male and middle-aged group. In Arm-A, 21 patients (70%) showed complete response whereas in Arm-B regimen complete response was noticed in 16 patients (53.3%) which was statistically significant; however, partial responses were significantly more found in Arm-B. Regarding toxicity, with Arm-A patients experienced slightly more toxicities in comparison to Arm-B which was statistically non-significant. Conclusion: So, it could be concluded from this study that the therapeutic gain was better obtained in Arm-A compared to Arm-B in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.
多西紫杉醇、顺铂、亚叶酸钙和5-氟尿嘧啶与亚叶酸钙、5-氟尿嘧啶和顺铂作为头颈癌新辅助化疗后放化疗的比较
背景:HNSCC是世界上第五大常见癌症,也是孟加拉国最常见的癌症之一。尽管放射治疗有了显著的改善,但局部区域复发率高是放射肿瘤学家面临的主要挑战。本研究旨在比较多西紫杉醇、顺铂、亚叶酸钙和5-氟尿嘧啶(TPLF)与亚叶酸钙、5-氟尿嘧啶和顺铂(LFP)作为新辅助化疗后顺铂同步放化疗治疗局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌的疗效和毒性。材料与方法:本研究于2015年1月至2015年12月在锡拉甘省赫瓦贾·尤努斯·阿里医学院和医院进行的60例局部晚期头颈癌患者的研究。在a组,30例患者接受了3个周期的新辅助化疗,D1为多西紫杉醇75 mg/m2, D1为顺铂75 mg/m2, D1为白藜芦醇30 mg/m2, D1为5-氟尿嘧啶750 mg/m2, B组30例患者接受了新辅助化疗,D1为顺铂75 mg/m2, D1为亚叶酸30 mg, D1为d3。5-氟尿嘧啶750mg/ m2, D1-D5 3个周期,间隔3周,随后同步放化疗66 Gy, 33次,每周顺铂40 mg/ m2,放射第一天开始。结果:患者以男性、中年组居多。a组有21例患者(70%)完全缓解,而b组有16例患者(53.3%)完全缓解,差异有统计学意义;然而,部分反应在Arm-B组明显更多。关于毒性,与a组相比,a组患者的毒性略高于b组,这在统计学上无显著性。结论:因此,本研究可以得出,局部晚期头颈癌患者a臂治疗效果优于b臂治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信