Armando Colorado, James T. Slama, William B. Stavinoha
{"title":"A new method for measuring auricular inflammation in the mouse","authors":"Armando Colorado, James T. Slama, William B. Stavinoha","doi":"10.1016/0160-5402(91)90056-B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The croton oil ear test is widely used to identify prospective topical antiinflammatory drugs. Ear inflammation is produced by applying a 2% solution of croton oil on the ears of mice or rats. The effectiveness of the drug that is dissolved in the croton oil solution can be gauged by comparing the croton oil treated ears with the croton oil plus drug treated ears. The effect is measured following sacrifice of the animal by weighing either the excised ear (Tonelli et al., 1965; Glenn et al.,1978; Swingle et al., 1981; Soliman et al., 1983; Mantione and Rodriguez, 1990) or a plug taken from the ear (Tubaro et al., 1985; Davis et al., 1989a; Davis et at., 1989b). Use of this technique for the generation of a time-course evaluation of antiinflammatory activity requires a large amount of the chemical to be tested and the sacrifice of many animals. In other assays, ear thickness has been measured by caliper (Carlson et al., 1985; Maloff et al., 1989) or by dial micrometer (Griswold et al., 1987), which allow multiple measurements to be made, but the pressure on the ear was not reported. In a recent review of pharmacological methods, Chang and Lewis (1989) caution that using calipers to measure ear thickness is subject to operator error and bias. Furthermore, they emphasize care must be taken to not leave the calipers in contact with the ear too long, as it is possible to squeeze substantial amounts of edema fluid out of the ear tissue. To address these limitations, this report describes a device for evaluating inflammation by measuring the thickness of the ear while using only precisely reproducible light pressure that does not vary with the operator of the instrument. The device allows a time sequence of measurements on the same animal, thus substantially reducing the amount of material and number of animals required for evaluation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological methods","volume":"26 1","pages":"Pages 73-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0160-5402(91)90056-B","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016054029190056B","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
The croton oil ear test is widely used to identify prospective topical antiinflammatory drugs. Ear inflammation is produced by applying a 2% solution of croton oil on the ears of mice or rats. The effectiveness of the drug that is dissolved in the croton oil solution can be gauged by comparing the croton oil treated ears with the croton oil plus drug treated ears. The effect is measured following sacrifice of the animal by weighing either the excised ear (Tonelli et al., 1965; Glenn et al.,1978; Swingle et al., 1981; Soliman et al., 1983; Mantione and Rodriguez, 1990) or a plug taken from the ear (Tubaro et al., 1985; Davis et al., 1989a; Davis et at., 1989b). Use of this technique for the generation of a time-course evaluation of antiinflammatory activity requires a large amount of the chemical to be tested and the sacrifice of many animals. In other assays, ear thickness has been measured by caliper (Carlson et al., 1985; Maloff et al., 1989) or by dial micrometer (Griswold et al., 1987), which allow multiple measurements to be made, but the pressure on the ear was not reported. In a recent review of pharmacological methods, Chang and Lewis (1989) caution that using calipers to measure ear thickness is subject to operator error and bias. Furthermore, they emphasize care must be taken to not leave the calipers in contact with the ear too long, as it is possible to squeeze substantial amounts of edema fluid out of the ear tissue. To address these limitations, this report describes a device for evaluating inflammation by measuring the thickness of the ear while using only precisely reproducible light pressure that does not vary with the operator of the instrument. The device allows a time sequence of measurements on the same animal, thus substantially reducing the amount of material and number of animals required for evaluation.
巴豆油耳试验被广泛用于鉴定有前景的局部抗炎药物。将2%的巴豆油溶液涂抹在小鼠或大鼠的耳朵上,就会产生耳部炎症。可通过比较巴豆油处理过的耳与巴豆油加药物处理过的耳来测量溶解在巴豆油溶液中的药物的有效性。在动物牺牲后,通过称重切除的耳朵来测量效果(Tonelli et al., 1965;Glenn et al.,1978;Swingle et al., 1981;Soliman et al., 1983;Mantione和Rodriguez, 1990)或从耳中取出塞子(Tubaro等人,1985;Davis et al., 1989a;戴维斯等着。, 1989 b)。使用这种技术来产生抗炎活性的时间过程评估需要大量的化学物质进行测试和牺牲许多动物。在其他试验中,耳廓厚度用卡尺测量(Carlson等人,1985;Maloff et al., 1989)或通过表盘千分尺(Griswold et al., 1987)进行多次测量,但没有报道耳朵上的压力。在最近对药理学方法的回顾中,Chang和Lewis(1989)警告说,使用卡尺测量耳朵厚度容易受到操作员误差和偏差的影响。此外,他们强调必须注意不要让卡尺与耳朵接触太久,因为这可能会从耳组织中挤出大量水肿液。为了解决这些限制,本报告描述了一种通过测量耳朵厚度来评估炎症的设备,同时只使用精确可重复的光压,不随仪器操作员的变化而变化。该设备允许在同一动物上按时间顺序进行测量,从而大大减少了评估所需的材料量和动物数量。