Human nail dust: hazard to chiropodists or merely nuisance?

M Gatley
{"title":"Human nail dust: hazard to chiropodists or merely nuisance?","authors":"M Gatley","doi":"10.1093/occmed/41.3.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This survey was carried out in response to anxiety among chiropodists as earlier reports had raised the possibility of respiratory damage as a result of sensitization to trichophytons. Questionnaires were sent to 327 chiropodists and 168 replies were received. The aim was to investigate respiratory symptoms and their relationship to work and drill usage. All of those completing questionnaires were invited to attend the occupational health department for prick tests and lung function tests. Just over one half of those who were invited attended. Although upper respiratory symptoms were common, only eye symptoms and wheeze were significantly more prevalent in those who used non-vacuum drills. Nasal symptoms were commoner in those who had spent less than ten years in the profession. Throat symptoms and multiple symptoms occurred more commonly in the 17 per cent of attenders who had positive prick tests to trichophytons. There were no cases of occupational asthma and no definite relationship between any symptom and work. It was confirmed that sensitization to trichophytons was common (16.5 per cent) but did not produce chest problems. Nail dust might produce symptoms by simple irritation of the upper respiratory tract.</p>","PeriodicalId":76684,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Society of Occupational Medicine","volume":"41 3","pages":"121-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/occmed/41.3.121","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Society of Occupational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/41.3.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

This survey was carried out in response to anxiety among chiropodists as earlier reports had raised the possibility of respiratory damage as a result of sensitization to trichophytons. Questionnaires were sent to 327 chiropodists and 168 replies were received. The aim was to investigate respiratory symptoms and their relationship to work and drill usage. All of those completing questionnaires were invited to attend the occupational health department for prick tests and lung function tests. Just over one half of those who were invited attended. Although upper respiratory symptoms were common, only eye symptoms and wheeze were significantly more prevalent in those who used non-vacuum drills. Nasal symptoms were commoner in those who had spent less than ten years in the profession. Throat symptoms and multiple symptoms occurred more commonly in the 17 per cent of attenders who had positive prick tests to trichophytons. There were no cases of occupational asthma and no definite relationship between any symptom and work. It was confirmed that sensitization to trichophytons was common (16.5 per cent) but did not produce chest problems. Nail dust might produce symptoms by simple irritation of the upper respiratory tract.

人甲尘:对足病医生有害还是仅仅令人讨厌?
这项调查是针对足病医生的焦虑进行的,因为早期的报告提出了毛癣菌致敏导致呼吸损伤的可能性。向327名手足科医生发送问卷,收到168份回复。目的是调查呼吸道症状及其与工作和钻头使用的关系。所有完成问卷的人都被邀请到职业健康科进行点刺测试和肺功能测试。被邀请的人中有一半以上的人出席了会议。虽然上呼吸道症状很常见,但在使用非真空钻头的人群中,只有眼部症状和喘息明显更普遍。鼻症状在那些从事该行业不到十年的人身上更为常见。喉部症状和多种症状更常见于毛癣菌针刺试验呈阳性的17%的参加者。没有职业性哮喘病例,任何症状与工作之间没有明确的关系。经证实,对毛癣菌过敏是常见的(16.5%),但不会产生胸部问题。甲尘可能引起上呼吸道的单纯刺激症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信