Design-based metrology: beyond CD/EPE metrics to evaluate printability performance

S. Halder, J. Mailfert, P. Leray, D. Rio, Yi-Hsing Peng, B. Laenens
{"title":"Design-based metrology: beyond CD/EPE metrics to evaluate printability performance","authors":"S. Halder, J. Mailfert, P. Leray, D. Rio, Yi-Hsing Peng, B. Laenens","doi":"10.1117/12.2221894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Process-window (PW) evaluation is critical to assess the lithography process quality and limitations. Usual CD-based PW gives only a partial answer. Simulations such as Tachyon LMC (Lithography Manufacturability Check) can efficiently overcome this limitation by analyzing the entire predicted resist contours. But so far experimental measurements did not allow such flexibility. This paper shows an innovative experimental flow, which allows the user to directly validate LMC results across PW for a select group of reference patterns, thereby overcoming the limitations found in the traditional CD-based PW analysis. To evaluate the process window on wafer more accurately, we take advantage of design based metrology and extract experimental contours from the CD-SEM measurements. Then we implement an area metric to quantify the area coverage of the experimental contours with respect to the intended ones, using a defined “sectorization” for the logic structures. This ‘sectorization’ aims to differentiate specific areas on the logic structures being analyzed, such as corners, line-ends, short and long lines. This way, a complete evaluation of the information contained in each CD-SEM picture is performed, without having to discard any information. This solution doesn’t look at the area coverage of an entire feature, but uses a ‘sectorization’ to differentiate specific feature areas such as corners, line-ends, short and long lines, and thus look at those area coverages. An assessment of resist model/OPC quality/process quality at sub nm-level accuracy is rendered possible.","PeriodicalId":193904,"journal":{"name":"SPIE Advanced Lithography","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPIE Advanced Lithography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2221894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Process-window (PW) evaluation is critical to assess the lithography process quality and limitations. Usual CD-based PW gives only a partial answer. Simulations such as Tachyon LMC (Lithography Manufacturability Check) can efficiently overcome this limitation by analyzing the entire predicted resist contours. But so far experimental measurements did not allow such flexibility. This paper shows an innovative experimental flow, which allows the user to directly validate LMC results across PW for a select group of reference patterns, thereby overcoming the limitations found in the traditional CD-based PW analysis. To evaluate the process window on wafer more accurately, we take advantage of design based metrology and extract experimental contours from the CD-SEM measurements. Then we implement an area metric to quantify the area coverage of the experimental contours with respect to the intended ones, using a defined “sectorization” for the logic structures. This ‘sectorization’ aims to differentiate specific areas on the logic structures being analyzed, such as corners, line-ends, short and long lines. This way, a complete evaluation of the information contained in each CD-SEM picture is performed, without having to discard any information. This solution doesn’t look at the area coverage of an entire feature, but uses a ‘sectorization’ to differentiate specific feature areas such as corners, line-ends, short and long lines, and thus look at those area coverages. An assessment of resist model/OPC quality/process quality at sub nm-level accuracy is rendered possible.
基于设计的计量:超越CD/EPE度量来评估可印刷性性能
工艺窗(PW)评价是评价光刻工艺质量和局限性的关键。通常基于cd的PW只能给出部分答案。像Tachyon LMC(光刻可制造性检查)这样的模拟可以通过分析整个预测的抗蚀剂轮廓有效地克服这一限制。但到目前为止,实验测量还不允许这种灵活性。本文展示了一个创新的实验流程,它允许用户直接验证LMC结果跨PW选择一组参考模式,从而克服了传统的基于cd的PW分析的局限性。为了更准确地评估晶圆上的工艺窗口,我们利用基于设计的计量方法,从CD-SEM测量中提取实验轮廓。然后,我们实现了一个面积度量来量化实验轮廓相对于预期轮廓的面积覆盖,对逻辑结构使用定义的“分割”。这种“部门化”旨在区分正在分析的逻辑结构上的特定区域,例如角、线端、短线和长线。这样,就可以对每张CD-SEM图片中包含的信息进行完整的评估,而不必丢弃任何信息。这个解决方案并不关注整个特征的区域覆盖,而是使用“分割”来区分特定的特征区域,如角落、线端、短线和长线,从而关注这些区域覆盖。亚纳米级精度的抗蚀剂模型/OPC质量/工艺质量评估成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信