Deep Learning-Based and Kernel-Based Proxy Models for Nonlinearly Constrained Life-Cycle Production Optimization

A. Atadeger, M. Onur, Soham Sheth, R. Banerjee
{"title":"Deep Learning-Based and Kernel-Based Proxy Models for Nonlinearly Constrained Life-Cycle Production Optimization","authors":"A. Atadeger, M. Onur, Soham Sheth, R. Banerjee","doi":"10.2118/212690-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this study, we investigate the use of deep learning-based and kernel-based proxy models in nonlinearly constrained production optimization and compare their performances with directly using the high-fidelity simulators (HFS) for such optimization in terms of computational cost and optimal results obtained. One of the proxy models is embed to control and observe (E2CO), a deep learning-based model, and the other model is a kernel-based proxy, least-squares support-vector regression (LS-SVR). Both proxies have the capability of predicting well outputs. The sequential quadratic programming (SQP) method is used to perform nonlinearly constrained production optimization. The objective function considered here is the net present value (NPV), and the nonlinear state constraints are field liquid production rate (FLPR) and field water production rate (FWPR). NPV, FLPR, and FWPR are constructed by using two different types of proxy models. The gradient of the objective function as well as the Jacobian matrix of constraints are computed analytically for the LS-SVR, whereas the method of stochastic simplex approximated gradient (StoSAG) is used for optimization with E2CO and HFS. The reservoir model considered in this study is a two-phase, three-dimensional reservoir with heterogeneous permeability which is taken from the SPE10 benchmark case. Well controls are optimized to maximize the NPV in an oil-water waterflooding scenario. It is observed that all proxy models can find optimal NPV results like optimal NPV obtained by HFS with much less computational effort. Among proxy models, LS-SVR is found to be less computationally demanding in the training process. Overall, both proxy models are orders of magnitude faster than numerical models in the prediction. We provide new insights into the accuracy and prediction performances of these machine learning-based proxy models for 3D oil-water systems as well as their efficiency in nonlinearly constrained production optimization for waterflooding applications.","PeriodicalId":215106,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, January 25, 2023","volume":"77 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, January 25, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212690-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the use of deep learning-based and kernel-based proxy models in nonlinearly constrained production optimization and compare their performances with directly using the high-fidelity simulators (HFS) for such optimization in terms of computational cost and optimal results obtained. One of the proxy models is embed to control and observe (E2CO), a deep learning-based model, and the other model is a kernel-based proxy, least-squares support-vector regression (LS-SVR). Both proxies have the capability of predicting well outputs. The sequential quadratic programming (SQP) method is used to perform nonlinearly constrained production optimization. The objective function considered here is the net present value (NPV), and the nonlinear state constraints are field liquid production rate (FLPR) and field water production rate (FWPR). NPV, FLPR, and FWPR are constructed by using two different types of proxy models. The gradient of the objective function as well as the Jacobian matrix of constraints are computed analytically for the LS-SVR, whereas the method of stochastic simplex approximated gradient (StoSAG) is used for optimization with E2CO and HFS. The reservoir model considered in this study is a two-phase, three-dimensional reservoir with heterogeneous permeability which is taken from the SPE10 benchmark case. Well controls are optimized to maximize the NPV in an oil-water waterflooding scenario. It is observed that all proxy models can find optimal NPV results like optimal NPV obtained by HFS with much less computational effort. Among proxy models, LS-SVR is found to be less computationally demanding in the training process. Overall, both proxy models are orders of magnitude faster than numerical models in the prediction. We provide new insights into the accuracy and prediction performances of these machine learning-based proxy models for 3D oil-water systems as well as their efficiency in nonlinearly constrained production optimization for waterflooding applications.
基于深度学习和基于核的非线性约束生命周期生产优化代理模型
在本研究中,我们研究了基于深度学习和基于核的代理模型在非线性约束生产优化中的使用,并在计算成本和获得的最优结果方面与直接使用高保真模拟器(HFS)进行优化的性能进行了比较。其中一个代理模型是嵌入控制和观察(E2CO),这是一个基于深度学习的模型,另一个模型是基于核的代理,最小二乘支持向量回归(LS-SVR)。两种代理都具有预测井产量的能力。采用序列二次规划(SQP)方法进行非线性约束生产优化。这里考虑的目标函数是净现值(NPV),非线性状态约束是油田产液率(FLPR)和油田产水率(FWPR)。NPV、FLPR和FWPR是通过使用两种不同类型的代理模型来构建的。LS-SVR采用解析方法计算目标函数的梯度和约束的雅可比矩阵,采用随机单纯形近似梯度法(StoSAG)对E2CO和HFS进行优化。本研究考虑的储层模型为两相非均质渗透率的三维储层,取自SPE10基准案例。在油水注水的情况下,优化了井控,使NPV最大化。观察到,所有代理模型都能以更少的计算量找到与HFS相同的最优NPV结果。在代理模型中,LS-SVR在训练过程中计算量较少。总的来说,两种代理模型在预测方面都比数值模型快几个数量级。我们对这些基于机器学习的3D油水系统代理模型的准确性和预测性能以及它们在水驱应用中非线性约束生产优化中的效率提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信