How Far Can We Go with Data Selection? A Case Study on Semantic Sequence Tagging Tasks

Samuel Louvan, B. Magnini
{"title":"How Far Can We Go with Data Selection? A Case Study on Semantic Sequence Tagging Tasks","authors":"Samuel Louvan, B. Magnini","doi":"10.18653/v1/2020.insights-1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although several works have addressed the role of data selection to improve transfer learning for various NLP tasks, there is no consensus about its real benefits and, more generally, there is a lack of shared practices on how it can be best applied. We propose a systematic approach aimed at evaluating data selection in scenarios of increasing complexity. Specifically, we compare the case in which source and target tasks are the same while source and target domains are different, against the more challenging scenario where both tasks and domains are different. We run a number of experiments on semantic sequence tagging tasks, which are relatively less investigated in data selection, and conclude that data selection has more benefit on the scenario when the tasks are the same, while in case of different (although related) tasks from distant domains, a combination of data selection and multi-task learning is ineffective for most cases.","PeriodicalId":441528,"journal":{"name":"First Workshop on Insights from Negative Results in NLP","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Workshop on Insights from Negative Results in NLP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.insights-1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although several works have addressed the role of data selection to improve transfer learning for various NLP tasks, there is no consensus about its real benefits and, more generally, there is a lack of shared practices on how it can be best applied. We propose a systematic approach aimed at evaluating data selection in scenarios of increasing complexity. Specifically, we compare the case in which source and target tasks are the same while source and target domains are different, against the more challenging scenario where both tasks and domains are different. We run a number of experiments on semantic sequence tagging tasks, which are relatively less investigated in data selection, and conclude that data selection has more benefit on the scenario when the tasks are the same, while in case of different (although related) tasks from distant domains, a combination of data selection and multi-task learning is ineffective for most cases.
数据选择我们能走多远?语义序列标注任务的实例研究
虽然有几项工作已经解决了数据选择在改善各种NLP任务的迁移学习中的作用,但对其真正的好处没有达成共识,更普遍的是,缺乏关于如何最好地应用它的共享实践。我们提出了一种系统的方法,旨在评估日益复杂的场景中的数据选择。具体来说,我们比较了源任务和目标任务相同而源和目标域不同的情况,以及任务和域都不同的更具挑战性的情况。我们对语义序列标记任务进行了大量实验,这些任务在数据选择中研究相对较少,并得出结论,数据选择在任务相同的情况下更有利,而在来自遥远领域的不同(尽管相关)任务的情况下,数据选择和多任务学习的结合在大多数情况下是无效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信