Kewenangan Penyidik Menetapkan Rehabilitasi Tanpa Penetapan Pengadilan pada Kasus Penyalahgunaan Narkotika

R. Setyawan, Anton Hendrik Samudra
{"title":"Kewenangan Penyidik Menetapkan Rehabilitasi Tanpa Penetapan Pengadilan pada Kasus Penyalahgunaan Narkotika","authors":"R. Setyawan, Anton Hendrik Samudra","doi":"10.24123/yustika.v22i01.2029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reviews criminal justice process in deterring drug abuse case, discussing rehabilitation as a part of criminal sanction and the implementation or existence without court ruling or decision. Several rules and regulations discussed in resolving this matter include Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics and Government Regulation Number 25 of 2011 concerning Mandatory Implementation of Narcotics Addict Report. The article was a part of bachelor’s degree thesis, conducted using normative legal study with case approach method. The case discussed is about rehabilitation of drug abuser Without Court’s order. The research finding is investigator do not have authority to place the drug abuser under rehabilitation. It is supposedly by court’s order.","PeriodicalId":367058,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL YUSTIKA: MEDIA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL YUSTIKA: MEDIA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24123/yustika.v22i01.2029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reviews criminal justice process in deterring drug abuse case, discussing rehabilitation as a part of criminal sanction and the implementation or existence without court ruling or decision. Several rules and regulations discussed in resolving this matter include Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics and Government Regulation Number 25 of 2011 concerning Mandatory Implementation of Narcotics Addict Report. The article was a part of bachelor’s degree thesis, conducted using normative legal study with case approach method. The case discussed is about rehabilitation of drug abuser Without Court’s order. The research finding is investigator do not have authority to place the drug abuser under rehabilitation. It is supposedly by court’s order.
调查权威规定,在药物滥用案件中,未经法院批准的康复
本文回顾了刑事司法程序在遏制吸毒案件中的作用,讨论了戒毒作为刑事制裁的一部分以及在没有法院裁决或决定的情况下实施或存在的问题。在解决这一问题时讨论的几项规则和条例包括2009年关于麻醉品的第35号法律和2011年关于强制执行麻醉品成瘾者报告的第25号政府条例。本文是本科学位论文的一部分,采用规范法学研究和案例研究法进行。本案例讨论的是未经法院命令对吸毒者进行康复治疗的问题。研究发现,调查人员没有权力将吸毒者送入康复中心。这应该是法院的命令。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信