Bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim width and peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measurement in myopic eyes with glaucoma

T. W. Ch’ng, J. Tan, Hilda Adnan Tassha, Bt Ja’afar Farrah, Bin Mt Saad Ahmad
{"title":"Bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim width and peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measurement in myopic eyes with glaucoma","authors":"T. W. Ch’ng, J. Tan, Hilda Adnan Tassha, Bt Ja’afar Farrah, Bin Mt Saad Ahmad","doi":"10.35119/myjo.v3i2.138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Optic nerve head imaging in myopic eyes with glaucoma is challenging due to atypical myopic optic disc morphology. Peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (pRNFL) and Bruch’s membrane opening-minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) utilize different anatomical reference points to measure the retinal nerve fibre layer. \nPurpose: To evaluate the diagnostic agreement between BMO-MRW and pRNFL in glaucomatous eyes with varying degrees of myopia. \nDesign: Prospective observational study. \nMethods: Forty-three eyes diagnosed as primary open-angle glaucoma, normal-tension glaucoma, and primary angle-closure glaucoma with varying degrees of myopia were included in the study. Geometric measurement of the neuroretinal rim tissue was conducted with spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) usingtwo different parameters: BMO-MRW and pRNFL. The classification of scan quality and diagnostic agreement between both methods were compared using an exact McNemar’s test. The association between the summary classifications of quality scans with myopic degree was assessed with Fisher’s exact test. \nResults: BMO-MRW had a higher percentage of good quality image scans compared to pRNFL (p = 0.004). BMO-MRW was capable of obtaining equally good quality scans for glaucomatous eyes with various myopic degrees, whereas pRNFL demonstrated a significant statistical difference between mild, moderate, and high myopia(p = 0.001). pRNFL was difficult to identify in highly myopic eyes. By excluding poor quality scans, the diagnostic agreement between both modalities was 48.4% (p = 0.002). The observed agreement was higher in low myopia (66.7%), followed by moderate myopia (28.6%) and high myopia (16.7%). \nConclusion: Compared to pRNFL, BMO-MRW is a better diagnostic imaging modality in glaucoma, especially for eyes with high myopia. Scan quality must be considered when interpreting OCT result in daily clinical practice to yield more accurate and reliable results.","PeriodicalId":405983,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35119/myjo.v3i2.138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Optic nerve head imaging in myopic eyes with glaucoma is challenging due to atypical myopic optic disc morphology. Peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (pRNFL) and Bruch’s membrane opening-minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) utilize different anatomical reference points to measure the retinal nerve fibre layer. Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic agreement between BMO-MRW and pRNFL in glaucomatous eyes with varying degrees of myopia. Design: Prospective observational study. Methods: Forty-three eyes diagnosed as primary open-angle glaucoma, normal-tension glaucoma, and primary angle-closure glaucoma with varying degrees of myopia were included in the study. Geometric measurement of the neuroretinal rim tissue was conducted with spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) usingtwo different parameters: BMO-MRW and pRNFL. The classification of scan quality and diagnostic agreement between both methods were compared using an exact McNemar’s test. The association between the summary classifications of quality scans with myopic degree was assessed with Fisher’s exact test. Results: BMO-MRW had a higher percentage of good quality image scans compared to pRNFL (p = 0.004). BMO-MRW was capable of obtaining equally good quality scans for glaucomatous eyes with various myopic degrees, whereas pRNFL demonstrated a significant statistical difference between mild, moderate, and high myopia(p = 0.001). pRNFL was difficult to identify in highly myopic eyes. By excluding poor quality scans, the diagnostic agreement between both modalities was 48.4% (p = 0.002). The observed agreement was higher in low myopia (66.7%), followed by moderate myopia (28.6%) and high myopia (16.7%). Conclusion: Compared to pRNFL, BMO-MRW is a better diagnostic imaging modality in glaucoma, especially for eyes with high myopia. Scan quality must be considered when interpreting OCT result in daily clinical practice to yield more accurate and reliable results.
近视伴青光眼的Bruch膜开口最小边缘宽度和乳头周围视网膜神经纤维层厚度测定
摘要:视神经头成像在伴有青光眼的近视眼是具有挑战性的,由于不典型的近视视盘形态。乳头周围视网膜神经纤维层(pRNFL)和Bruch膜开口-最小边缘宽度(BMO-MRW)采用不同的解剖参考点来测量视网膜神经纤维层。目的:评价BMO-MRW与pRNFL对不同程度近视青光眼的诊断符合性。设计:前瞻性观察研究。方法:对43只诊断为原发性开角型青光眼、正常张力型青光眼和不同程度近视的原发性闭角型青光眼进行研究。采用光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)对神经视网膜边缘组织进行几何测量,使用两个不同的参数:BMO-MRW和pRNFL。采用精确的McNemar试验对两种方法的扫描质量分类和诊断一致性进行了比较。用Fisher精确检验评估质量扫描的综合分类与近视程度之间的关系。结果:与pRNFL相比,BMO-MRW具有更高的高质量图像扫描百分比(p = 0.004)。BMO-MRW能够对不同近视程度的青光眼获得同等质量的扫描,而pRNFL在轻度、中度和高度近视之间具有显著的统计学差异(p = 0.001)。pRNFL在高度近视眼中难以识别。通过排除低质量扫描,两种方式的诊断一致性为48.4% (p = 0.002)。低近视(66.7%)、中度近视(28.6%)和高度近视(16.7%)的一致性最高。结论:与pRNFL相比,BMO-MRW是一种更好的青光眼诊断成像方式,特别是对高度近视的眼睛。在日常临床实践中,在解释OCT结果时必须考虑扫描质量,以获得更准确和可靠的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信