Classroom Education and the Development of Units of Verbal Thinking: Interpreting the Results of Comparative Experimental Studies of People Who Did or Did Not Attend School

P. Tulviste
{"title":"Classroom Education and the Development of Units of Verbal Thinking: Interpreting the Results of Comparative Experimental Studies of People Who Did or Did Not Attend School","authors":"P. Tulviste","doi":"10.1080/10610405.2019.1620068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article discusses the performance of adults who did and did not attend school in experiments involving the definition of concepts, the finding of word-pair similarities, classification, and language objectivation. Most of the differences described correspond to the differences between every day and scientific concepts identified by L.S. Vygotsky. The existing data are insufficient to determine whether all the qualitative differences listed by Vygotsky exist between units of verbal thinking in those who did and did not attend school. In some cases, the thinking of people who did not attend school exhibits features that, according to Vygotsky, should emerge only in school with the assimilation of scientific knowledge (language objectivation and the “super-empirical” connections between concepts).","PeriodicalId":308330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Russian & East European Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Russian & East European Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2019.1620068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract This article discusses the performance of adults who did and did not attend school in experiments involving the definition of concepts, the finding of word-pair similarities, classification, and language objectivation. Most of the differences described correspond to the differences between every day and scientific concepts identified by L.S. Vygotsky. The existing data are insufficient to determine whether all the qualitative differences listed by Vygotsky exist between units of verbal thinking in those who did and did not attend school. In some cases, the thinking of people who did not attend school exhibits features that, according to Vygotsky, should emerge only in school with the assimilation of scientific knowledge (language objectivation and the “super-empirical” connections between concepts).
课堂教育与语言思维单元的发展:对上学或不上学的人的比较实验研究结果的解释
摘要:本文讨论了上学和不上学的成年人在概念定义、单词对相似性、分类和语言客观化方面的实验表现。所描述的大多数差异对应于日常生活和维果茨基所确定的科学概念之间的差异。现有的数据不足以确定维果斯基所列出的所有质的差异是否存在于那些上过学和没上过学的人的言语思维单位之间。根据维戈茨基的说法,在某些情况下,没有上过学的人的思维表现出一些特征,这些特征应该只在学校里随着科学知识的同化(语言客观化和概念之间的“超经验”联系)而出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信