Clinical Neurology: Patients’ Laterality Audit

R. S. Siddiqui, Khurram A Siddiqui, D. Nicholl
{"title":"Clinical Neurology: Patients’ Laterality Audit","authors":"R. S. Siddiqui, Khurram A Siddiqui, D. Nicholl","doi":"10.15406/JNSK.2018.08.00273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most people tend to have left hemispheric dominance for speech [1], as the left side of the brain controls the right side of the body supported by the overall higher proportion of right handers to left handers [2]. However studies have shown that some left handed neurologic patients may have bilateral hemispheric control or solely right hemispheric control of speech [3]. Hence, due to the relationship between handedness and language lateralization [1], it is essential doctors ask neurologic patients of their handedness in order to predict which side of the brain is more likely dominant for speech. We also observed whether patient’s were asked if they were forced to become right handed or was it natural, as some studies show that the proportion of left handers may be less due to forced dexterity [4,5]. Some studies have also shown that footedness might actually be preferred over handedness in determining lateralization especially in left handed people [6]. This audit was carried out in order to test a potential shortfall of inquiring patients’ laterality during neurology consults. It was developed in order to find out the proportion of doctors asking patients of their laterality i.e. handedness and/or footedness i.e. right or left.","PeriodicalId":106839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology and Stroke","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology and Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/JNSK.2018.08.00273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most people tend to have left hemispheric dominance for speech [1], as the left side of the brain controls the right side of the body supported by the overall higher proportion of right handers to left handers [2]. However studies have shown that some left handed neurologic patients may have bilateral hemispheric control or solely right hemispheric control of speech [3]. Hence, due to the relationship between handedness and language lateralization [1], it is essential doctors ask neurologic patients of their handedness in order to predict which side of the brain is more likely dominant for speech. We also observed whether patient’s were asked if they were forced to become right handed or was it natural, as some studies show that the proportion of left handers may be less due to forced dexterity [4,5]. Some studies have also shown that footedness might actually be preferred over handedness in determining lateralization especially in left handed people [6]. This audit was carried out in order to test a potential shortfall of inquiring patients’ laterality during neurology consults. It was developed in order to find out the proportion of doctors asking patients of their laterality i.e. handedness and/or footedness i.e. right or left.
临床神经病学:患者侧位审计
大多数人倾向于左半球主导语言[1],因为左脑控制身体的右侧,总体上右撇子比左撇子的比例更高[2]。然而,研究表明,一些左撇子神经系统患者可能有双半球控制或仅右半球控制语言[3]。因此,由于利手性和语言偏侧化之间的关系[1],医生有必要询问神经系统患者的利手性,以预测大脑的哪一侧更可能主导语言。我们还观察了患者是否被问及他们是被迫成为右撇子还是自然成为右撇子,因为一些研究表明,由于被迫灵巧,左撇子的比例可能会减少[4,5]。一些研究还表明,在决定偏侧化方面,脚性实际上可能优于手性,尤其是左撇子[6]。这项审计是为了测试在神经病学会诊期间询问患者侧性的潜在不足。它的发展是为了找出比例的医生问病人他们的偏侧性,即惯用手和/或脚,即右或左。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信