Determining the Most Significant Metadata Features to Indicate Defective Software Commits

Rupam Dey, Anahita Khojandi, K. Perumalla
{"title":"Determining the Most Significant Metadata Features to Indicate Defective Software Commits","authors":"Rupam Dey, Anahita Khojandi, K. Perumalla","doi":"10.1109/SERA57763.2023.10197721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Defects are largely inevitable in the software development life cycle. Since we cannot avoid them during the development process, we can only desire to fight back with our limited resources in terms of time and monetary investment. Like in many other fields, machine learning models can be of help to mitigate the problem of defects by predicting both bug frequency and defective modules at different granularity levels. However, machine learning models are as good as the quality of the pre-selected set of features under consideration. Therefore, importance must be given while selecting only the necessary features from the original set of features. In this study, we compared various machine learning models with varying feature selection techniques and found the superiority of random forest-based machine learning techniques with wrapper methods. Random forest-based models with the wrapper method were able to detect all the buggy classes successfully on the validation data set.","PeriodicalId":211080,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE/ACIS 21st International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE/ACIS 21st International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SERA57763.2023.10197721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Defects are largely inevitable in the software development life cycle. Since we cannot avoid them during the development process, we can only desire to fight back with our limited resources in terms of time and monetary investment. Like in many other fields, machine learning models can be of help to mitigate the problem of defects by predicting both bug frequency and defective modules at different granularity levels. However, machine learning models are as good as the quality of the pre-selected set of features under consideration. Therefore, importance must be given while selecting only the necessary features from the original set of features. In this study, we compared various machine learning models with varying feature selection techniques and found the superiority of random forest-based machine learning techniques with wrapper methods. Random forest-based models with the wrapper method were able to detect all the buggy classes successfully on the validation data set.
确定最重要的元数据特征以指示有缺陷的软件提交
缺陷在软件开发生命周期中是不可避免的。因为我们无法在开发过程中避开它们,所以我们只能在时间和金钱投入方面利用有限的资源进行反击。与许多其他领域一样,机器学习模型可以通过预测不同粒度级别的错误频率和缺陷模块来帮助减轻缺陷问题。然而,机器学习模型与预先选择的特征集的质量一样好。因此,在从原始特征集中只选择必要的特征时,必须给予重要性。在这项研究中,我们比较了不同特征选择技术的各种机器学习模型,发现了基于随机森林的机器学习技术与包装方法的优越性。使用包装器方法的基于随机森林的模型能够成功地检测验证数据集中的所有有bug的类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信