People’s War: Military supplies during the Mozambican Civil War, 1976-1992

M. Mubai, C. Darch, João M. Cabrita, J. Weinstein, Stephen C. Lubkemann
{"title":"People’s War: Military supplies during the Mozambican Civil War, 1976-1992","authors":"M. Mubai, C. Darch, João M. Cabrita, J. Weinstein, Stephen C. Lubkemann","doi":"10.18820/24150509/sjch45.v2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From 1976 to 1992, the government of Mozambique under the leadership of Frente de Libertação de Moçambique (FRELIMO) and Resistência Nacional Moçambicana (RENAMO), the latter sponsored by the right-wing and racist regimes of Rhodesia and South Africa went to war. The independence of Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) in 1980 and the signing of the Nkomati Non-aggression Pact between the government of Mozambique and South Africa in 1984 led scholars and government officials to claim that the government would win the war because RENAMO had lost its support. These claims proved wrong as RENAMO resisted for another eight years until the signing of the general peace agreement in 1992. The paper argues that the continuation of military confrontations shows that wars are mainly fought with a complex combination of means that are not necessarily military. Claiming that the survival of RENAMO depended on external support represents a misunderstanding of the logistics and morale of both RENAMO and government troops. It is from this perspective that this paper looks at the logistics and enthusiasm of both RENAMO and government military to demonstrate that both lacked adequate military logistics to wage war. It shows that the belligerents depended on civilians and surrounding natural resources to obtain the bulk of supplies of staple foods and recruits. This state of affairs compels scholars to rethink the nature of civil wars and helps to explain the almost decade long delay in achieving peace in Mozambique. It also shows that the burden of the Mozambican civil war fell on the shoulders of civilians. Thus, what is often described as a hotspot of Cold War in Southern Africa or a war of aggression by the apartheid regime was, in practice, a peoples’ war with devastating, yet varied impacts on peoples’ livelihoods. This section provides an overview of the poor material conditions and low morale of the Mozambican armed forces at national level. It includes the voices of people who dealt with this resource scarcity in the interior of southern Mozambique. In the process, it demystifies the idea that only RENAMO forces depended on the extortion of civilians. Based on evidence from fieldwork, it shows that despite having access to armoured vehicles and helicopters, the idea that government troops were well equipped, and disciplined is misleading. It conceals many problems such corruption, and reliance on obsolete communication networks. 92","PeriodicalId":409914,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Contemporary History","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Contemporary History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18820/24150509/sjch45.v2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From 1976 to 1992, the government of Mozambique under the leadership of Frente de Libertação de Moçambique (FRELIMO) and Resistência Nacional Moçambicana (RENAMO), the latter sponsored by the right-wing and racist regimes of Rhodesia and South Africa went to war. The independence of Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) in 1980 and the signing of the Nkomati Non-aggression Pact between the government of Mozambique and South Africa in 1984 led scholars and government officials to claim that the government would win the war because RENAMO had lost its support. These claims proved wrong as RENAMO resisted for another eight years until the signing of the general peace agreement in 1992. The paper argues that the continuation of military confrontations shows that wars are mainly fought with a complex combination of means that are not necessarily military. Claiming that the survival of RENAMO depended on external support represents a misunderstanding of the logistics and morale of both RENAMO and government troops. It is from this perspective that this paper looks at the logistics and enthusiasm of both RENAMO and government military to demonstrate that both lacked adequate military logistics to wage war. It shows that the belligerents depended on civilians and surrounding natural resources to obtain the bulk of supplies of staple foods and recruits. This state of affairs compels scholars to rethink the nature of civil wars and helps to explain the almost decade long delay in achieving peace in Mozambique. It also shows that the burden of the Mozambican civil war fell on the shoulders of civilians. Thus, what is often described as a hotspot of Cold War in Southern Africa or a war of aggression by the apartheid regime was, in practice, a peoples’ war with devastating, yet varied impacts on peoples’ livelihoods. This section provides an overview of the poor material conditions and low morale of the Mozambican armed forces at national level. It includes the voices of people who dealt with this resource scarcity in the interior of southern Mozambique. In the process, it demystifies the idea that only RENAMO forces depended on the extortion of civilians. Based on evidence from fieldwork, it shows that despite having access to armoured vehicles and helicopters, the idea that government troops were well equipped, and disciplined is misleading. It conceals many problems such corruption, and reliance on obsolete communication networks. 92
《人民战争:1976-1992年莫桑比克内战期间的军事供应》
1976年至1992年,莫桑比克政府在解放莫桑比克运动阵线(莫解阵线)和Resistência莫桑比克民族运动(抵运)领导下进行了战争,后者由罗得西亚和南非的右翼和种族主义政权赞助。1980年罗得西亚(现在的津巴布韦)独立,1984年莫桑比克政府和南非政府签署了《恩科马蒂互不侵犯条约》,这使得学者和政府官员声称,由于抵运失去了支持,政府将赢得这场战争。这些说法被证明是错误的,抵运又抵抗了八年,直到1992年签署《全面和平协定》。本文认为,军事对抗的持续表明,战争主要是通过一系列复杂的手段进行的,而这些手段不一定是军事手段。声称抵运的生存取决于外部支助是对抵运和政府军的后勤和士气的误解。本文正是从这个角度来考察抵运和政府军的后勤和积极性,以证明双方都缺乏足够的军事后勤来发动战争。它表明交战双方依靠平民和周围的自然资源来获得大部分主食和新兵。这种状况迫使学者们重新思考内战的本质,并有助于解释莫桑比克实现和平拖延了近十年的原因。它还表明,莫桑比克内战的负担落在了平民的肩上。因此,经常被描述为南部非洲的冷战热点或种族隔离政权的侵略战争实际上是一场人民战争,对人民的生计产生了毁灭性的但不同的影响。本节概述了莫桑比克武装部队在国家一级物质条件差和士气低落的情况。它包括了在莫桑比克南部内陆处理资源短缺问题的人们的声音。在这个过程中,它消除了只有抵运部队依靠勒索平民的想法。根据实地调查所得的证据,报告显示,尽管政府军拥有装甲车和直升机,但认为政府军装备精良、纪律严明的观点是错误的。它掩盖了许多问题,如腐败和依赖过时的通信网络。92
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信