Build Waiting Time in Continuous Integration -- An Initial Interdisciplinary Literature Review

E. Laukkanen, M. Mäntylä
{"title":"Build Waiting Time in Continuous Integration -- An Initial Interdisciplinary Literature Review","authors":"E. Laukkanen, M. Mäntylä","doi":"10.1109/RCOSE.2015.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this position paper, we present and demonstrate the idea of using an interdisciplinary literature review to accelerate the research on continuous integration practice. A common suggestion has been that build waiting time in continuous integration cycle should be less than 10 minutes. This guideline is based on practitioners' opinion and has not been further investigated. The objective of this study is to understand the effects of build waiting time in software engineering and to get input from waiting time research in other disciplines. The objective is met by performing two literature reviews, first on build waiting time and second on waiting times in the contexts of service operation, web use and computer use. The found effects of build waiting time were categorized into continuous integration specific, cognitive and emotional. Two minute build waiting time was considered optimal, but under 10 minutes was considered acceptable. Insight from other waiting time research suggests that the perceptions of waiting time are important and the perceptions can be lowered by providing feedback and giving developers other activities during the integration.","PeriodicalId":194076,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Rapid Continuous Software Engineering","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Rapid Continuous Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RCOSE.2015.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

In this position paper, we present and demonstrate the idea of using an interdisciplinary literature review to accelerate the research on continuous integration practice. A common suggestion has been that build waiting time in continuous integration cycle should be less than 10 minutes. This guideline is based on practitioners' opinion and has not been further investigated. The objective of this study is to understand the effects of build waiting time in software engineering and to get input from waiting time research in other disciplines. The objective is met by performing two literature reviews, first on build waiting time and second on waiting times in the contexts of service operation, web use and computer use. The found effects of build waiting time were categorized into continuous integration specific, cognitive and emotional. Two minute build waiting time was considered optimal, but under 10 minutes was considered acceptable. Insight from other waiting time research suggests that the perceptions of waiting time are important and the perceptions can be lowered by providing feedback and giving developers other activities during the integration.
构建持续集成中的等待时间——一个初步的跨学科文献综述
在这篇论文中,我们提出并展示了使用跨学科文献综述来加速持续集成实践研究的想法。一个常见的建议是,持续集成周期中的构建等待时间应该少于10分钟。该指南是基于从业人员的意见,尚未进一步调查。本研究的目的是了解构建等待时间在软件工程中的影响,并从其他学科的等待时间研究中获得输入。通过进行两项文献回顾,首先是构建等待时间,其次是服务操作、web使用和计算机使用上下文中的等待时间,从而实现了目标。所发现的构建等待时间的影响可分为持续整合具体影响、认知影响和情感影响。两分钟的构建等待时间被认为是最佳的,但10分钟以下被认为是可以接受的。来自其他等待时间研究的见解表明,等待时间的感知是重要的,并且可以通过提供反馈和在集成期间给予开发人员其他活动来降低感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信